羌塘盆地中新生代隆升剥蚀与上三叠统-侏罗系烃源层埋藏史分析
- 收稿日期:
2023-07-12
- 网络出版日期:
2024-04-09
摘要: 羌塘盆地位于全球最主要的油气聚集带——特提斯构造域的东段,一直被列为油气资源战略准备区。但油气资源潜力一直存在很大的分歧,制约了对羌塘盆地油气勘探的整体认识。恢复关键构造期盆地剥蚀量,分析盆地埋藏过程对深化羌塘盆地主力烃源岩生烃潜力与油气资源潜力具有重要的作用。羌塘盆地目前勘探程度低,本文基于资料现状与前人研究成果,运用构造-沉积充填外推法,分析了羌塘盆地主要构造活动期次,恢复关键构造期剥蚀量,同时运用TSM盆地模拟系统,分析了上三叠统-侏罗系三套烃源层埋藏过程。研究认为:1)羌塘盆地自晚三叠世以来经历了四期主要剥蚀事件:晚三叠世-早侏罗世(210-180Ma)、早白垩世(120-110Ma)、古新世-始新世早期(60-45Ma)和中新世早期以来(~25Ma),这些剥蚀事件与盆地主要构造活动期一一对应;2)210-180Ma:盆地主体发生抬升,晚三叠世肖茶卡组顶部遭受剥蚀形成古风化壳,盆地中央隆起带和北羌塘坳陷剥蚀较为强烈;120-110Ma,盆地地层发生大规模褶皱,盆地中央隆起带及其两侧、盆地东部地区剥蚀最强烈;北羌塘坳陷中-西部剥蚀相对较弱,其次为南羌塘坳陷南部;~60-45Ma,受印度大陆和亚洲大陆碰撞的远程效应的影响,盆地逆冲断层普遍发育,平均抬升剥蚀约0.75km左右;~25Ma以来,盆地继续受南北向挤压应力影响,盆地逆断层持续活动普遍且较均匀,盆地各处抬升速率较接近,在一定程度上具整体抬升性质;3)受地层沉积厚度、多期构造抬升差异性剥蚀等影响,羌塘盆地上三叠统-侏罗系烃源层两次最大深埋分别发生在雪山组沉积之后、新近系康托组及唢呐湖组沉积之后。两期主力生烃期与最大埋深及其随后的构造抬升相对应。
Analysis of the Mesozoic – Cenozoic uplift and denudation and restoration of burial history of the Upper Triassic – Jurassic source beds in Qiangtang Basin
- Received Date:
2023-07-12
- Available Online:
2024-04-09
Abstract: Qiangtang Basin, located in the most important oil & gas accumulation belt worldwide - eastern section of Tethys tectonic domain, has been listed as a strategic preparation area for oil & gas resources. However, there had been great arguments on the potential of oil & gas resources, which restricted the overall understanding of oil & gas exploration in Qiangtang Basin. Restoring the denudation history of basin in key tectonic periods and analyzing the burial history of source rocks is of great significance to deepen the hydrocarbon potential of leading source rocks and oil & gas resources in Qiangtang Basin. Based on the current data and previous research results, the main tectonic activities were analyzed and the denudation history of Qiangtang Basin in key tectonic periods were restored by using the structural-sedimentary extrapolation method. At the same time, the burial history of three sets of leading source beds in the Upper Triassic-Jurassic was analyzed by using the TSM basin simulation system. The results showed that: 1) Since the Late Triassic, Qiangtang basin had experienced four periods of tectonic movements: one period from the late Triassic to early Jurassic (210-180Ma)、the late Early Cretaceous (120-110Ma) and the Paleocene to the early Eocene (60-45Ma) and since the early Miocene; 2) At the first period (210-110Ma), Most areas of the basin was uplifted to the surface. The top of the Late Triassic Formation was denuded to form an ancient weathering crust, and then the volcanic rocks were deposited. The central uplift zone of the basin and the Northern Qiangtang were denuded most strongly; Between 120 and 110Ma, the basin strata were folded strongly, and the denudation was most intense in the central uplift zone and its two sides, and in the eastern part of the basin. The denudation is relatively weak in the middle and west of the North Qiangtang depression, and the south of the South Qiangtang. From 60 to 45 Ma, influenced by the long-range effect of the collision between the Indian continent and the Asian continent, the basin shortening rate is 11.9%, and the average uplift and denuded is about 700m. Since 23Ma, the basin continues to be affected by the north-south extrusion stress, and the whole basin escapes to the southeast direction. The basin's thrust faults continue to be active generally and more uniformly, and a number of normal faults or grabens were developed. The uplift rate of all parts of the basin is similar, and the uplift erosion is about 700m to some extent. 3) Influenced by the sedimentary thickness of the stratum and the differential denudation of multi-stage tectonic uplift, the maximum burial of the Upper Triassic Jurassic source beds in Qiangtang Basin occurred twice after the deposition of the J3-K1 Xueshan Formation and after the deposition of the Neogene Nkangtuo Formation and Suonahu Formation, respectively. The two main hydrocarbon generation periods corresponded to the two maximum burial depths and the subsequent tectonic uplift.