Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin

YUAN Wen-fang; CHEN Shi-yue; ZENG Chang-min

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Acta Sedimentologica Sinica > 2005 > 23(4): 604-612

YUAN Wen-fang, CHEN Shi-yue, ZENG Chang-min. Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(4): 604-612.

Citation:

YUAN Wen-fang, CHEN Shi-yue, ZENG Chang-min. Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005, 23(4): 604-612.

Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin

1.
Faculty of Geo-Resources and Information in China University of Petroleum, Dongying Shandong 257061;
2.
Institute of Exploration and Development of Tarim Oil Field Division Company, CNPC, Korla Xinjiang 841000

Received Date: 2005-01-07
Rev Recd Date: 2005-03-21
Publish Date: 2005-12-10

Abstract

The question whether transgression happened in Paleogene of BohaiBayBasin has been discussed formore than 20 years, yet itwas not resolved. The scholars insisting on transgression p rovided manymarkers such asmineralogy,lithology, paleoecology and geochemistry, but these makers are not completely the same as normalmarine makers, moreover, the passageway and obviously increased makers of transgression have not been discovered, so "marine flooding" , " tsunami" and " terrestrial facies" appear, these viewpoints have coexisted for a long time. Penman considers that the question can be solved by 4 ways: ①The structural setting of BohaiBay Basin should be studied thoroughly to conclude possibility of the transgression's passageway. ②Reliability of marine makers provided should be newly considered. ③New and exclusive evidences are required. ④Similar sediment trap s in correlative strata abroad are collected to research contrastively
- Bohai Bay Basin,
- Paleogene,
- transgression,
- elementary fossil,
- isotope

References

[1]

1 朱浩然. 山东滨县下第三系沙河街组的藻类化石[J].古生物学报,1979,(04):324-341.

2 陈木,吴宝铃. 山东济阳坳陷下第三系多毛类虫管的发现[J].海洋学报(中文版),1979,(02):338-340.

3 钱凯,王素民,刘淑范. 华东北部下第三系礁灰岩的发现及其石油地质意义[J].科学通报,1980,(24):1140-1142.

4 于众. 我国辽河地区发现钙质超微化石[J].石油勘探与开发,1982,(03):82.

5 何镜宇,余素玉. 黄骅坳陷下第三系的海绿石[J].地球科学,1982,(16):129-142.

6 唐祥华. 渤海湾盆地沙河街组钙质超微化石古生态及沉积环境[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1993,(01):48-55.

7 郝诒纯,李蕙生. 渤海沿岸及邻近地区早第三纪钙质超微化石的发现及其意义[J].科学通报,1984,(12):741-745.

8 张弥曼. 渤海沿岸第三系化石[J].中国科学院古脊椎和古人类研究所集刊,1985,(17):1-60.

9 钟筱春,钟石兰,费轩东. 渤海湾盆地沙河街组一段颗石藻类化石及其沉积环境[J].微体古生物学报,1988,(02):145-151.

10 彭世福,许红,温珍河. 试论渤海湾盆地沙河街组海侵作用与油气[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1989,(01):17-28.

11 魏魁生,徐怀大. 冀中地区早第三纪海泛特征及其层序地层学意义[J].现代地质,1993,(03):274-284.

12 张玉宾. 济阳坳陷及其邻近地区早第三纪海侵问题之我见[J].岩相古地理,1997,(01):4549.

13 任来义,林桂芳,赵志清. 东濮凹陷早第三纪的海侵(泛)事件[J].古生物学报,2000,(04):553-557.

14 何伟钢,金奎励,郝多虎. 济阳坳陷郭7井沙河街组三段泥岩生、储油特性及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,(04):375-379.

15 吴贤涛,任来义. 渤海湾盆地古近纪海水通道与储层探新[J].古生物学报,2004,(01):147-154.

16 葛瑞全,宋传春,淳萍. 济阳沾-车凹陷古近系沙河街组海侵的再认识[J].高校地质学报,2003,(03):450-457.

17 葛瑞全. 济阳坳陷新生界海绿石的存在及其地质意义[J].沉积学报,2004,(02):276-280.

18 张国栋,王慧中. 中国东部早第三纪海侵和沉积环境[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.

19 张玉宾. 事件性海侵与烃源岩的形成[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,(06):78-80.

20 童晓光. 中国东部早第三纪海侵质疑[J].地质论评,1985,(03):261-267.

21 孙镇城,杨藩,张枝焕. 中国新生代咸化湖泊沉积环境与油气生成[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.

22 陈绍周,高兴辰,丘东洲. 中国早第三纪海陆过渡相[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,(04):343-349.

23 梁名胜. 中国东部早第三纪海侵期的划分[J].海洋地质研究,1982,(02):97-100.

24 田景春,尹观,覃健雄. 中国东部早第三纪海侵与湖相白云岩成因之关系[J].中国海上油气(地质),1998,(04):250-254.

25 赵澄林,刘孟慧. 东濮凹陷下第三系砂体微相和成岩作用[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1988.15.

26 汪品先,闵秋宝,林景星. 我国东部新生代几个盆地半咸水有孔虫化石群的发现及意义[A].北京:地质出版社,1975.

27 汪品先. 海陆相地层辨认标志[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.

28 裘松余. 我国第三纪有孔虫组合特征及其生态与古地理、油气关系[A].北京:地质出版社,1982.

29 吴宝铃. 石油和虫管化石[J].海洋科学,1980,(01):19-22.

30 赵志清,吕红玉. 东濮凹陷盆地晚始新世生物群及其古环境的探讨[J].微体古生物学报,1988,(03):315-322.

31 姚益民,徐金鲤,单怀广. 山东济阳坳陷在第三纪海侵的讨论[J].石油学报,1992,(02):29-34.

32 石油化学工业部石油勘探开发规划研究院,中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所. 渤海沿岸地区新生代有孔虫、早第三纪介形类、早第三纪腹足类、早第三纪轮藻、早第三纪沟鞭藻类和疑源藻类[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.

33 汪品先,闵秋宝,卞云华. 关于我国东部含油盆地早第三纪地层的沉积环境[J].地质论评,1982,(05):402-411.

34 李应暹,卢宗盛,王丹. 辽河盆地陆相遗迹化石与沉积环境研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.

35 吴贤涛,林又玲,潘结南. 东濮凹陷沙河街组痕迹相及其对应的测井图型[J].古地理学报,1999,(03):50-64.

36 Walker C T,Price N B. Departure curvesf of computing paleosalinity from boroninillites and shalfs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1968,(05):833-841.

37 李成凤,肖继风. 用微量元素研究胜利油田东营盆地沙河街组的古盐度[J].沉积学报,1988,(04):100-106.

38 同济大学海洋地质系. 海陆相地层辨认标志[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.

39 Degens E F. Geochemistry of sediments:a brief survey[M].Prentice-Hall International,1965.315-322.

40 Keith M L,Weber F. arbon and oxygen isotopic compsition of selected limestone cosfossils[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1964.1786-1816.

41 洪志华. 济阳坳陷下第三系生油岩地球化学特征[J].地球化学,1983,(01):41-52.

42 单怀广,张慧娟. 山东油气区早第三纪介形类[A].北京:石油工业出版社,1981.

43 李守军,吴智平,马在平. 中国东部早第三纪有孔虫的生活环境[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1997,(02):1-7.

44 王云飞. 抚仙湖现代湖泊沉积物中海绿石的发现及其成因的初步研究[J].科学通报.

45 茅绍智,余静贤. 陆相沟鞭藻的起源和演化及其生油意义[J].地球科学,1990,(03):281-290.

46 刘传联,成鑫荣. 渤海湾盆地早第三纪非海相钙质超微化石的锶同位素证据[J].科学通报,1996,(10):908-910.

47 孙镇城,杨革联,乔子真. 我国咸化湖泊沉积中钙质超微化石特征及其地质意义[J].古地理学报,2002,(02):56-63.

48 刘传联,赵泉鸿,汪品先. 从化石群及壳体同位素看古近纪东营湖湖水化学[J].地球学报,2002,(03):237-242.

49 李亚文,韩蔚田. 蒸发岩成因的物理化学研究[J].地学前缘,1994,(3-4):211-215.

50 Summons R E,Volkman J K,Boreham C J. Dinosterane and other steroidal hydrocarbon of dinoflagellate origin in sediments and petroleum[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1987.3075-3082.

51 Goodwin N S,Mann A L,Patience R L. Structure and significance of C30 4-methyl stranes in lacustrine shales and oils[J].Organic Geochemistry,1988,(05):495-506.

52 Thomas J B,Marshall J,Mann A L,Summons R E,MaxwellJ R. Dinosteranes and other biological marker in dinoflagellate-rich marine sediments of Rhaetianage[J].Organic Geochemistry,1993,(01):91-104.

53 侯读杰,王铁冠. 陆相沉积物和原油中的甲藻甾烷[J].科学通报,1995,(04):333-335.

54 侯读杰,黄清华,黄福堂. 松辽盆地海侵地层的分子地球化学特征[J].石油学报,1999,(02):30-34.

55 Purvis K. Lower Permian rotliegendsandstones,southern North Sea: a case study of diagenesis in evaporite-associated sequences[J].Sedimentary Geology,1992,(77):155-171.

56 王璞珺,刘万洙. 事件沉积:导论·实例·应用[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2001.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(706) PDF downloads(907) Cited by()

Proportional views

Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin

1. Faculty of Geo-Resources and Information in China University of Petroleum, Dongying Shandong 257061;

2. Institute of Exploration and Development of Tarim Oil Field Division Company, CNPC, Korla Xinjiang 841000

Received Date: 2005-01-07

Rev Recd Date: 2005-03-21

Publish Date: 2005-12-10

Key words:

Abstract: The question whether transgression happened in Paleogene of BohaiBayBasin has been discussed formore than 20 years, yet itwas not resolved. The scholars insisting on transgression p rovided manymarkers such asmineralogy,lithology, paleoecology and geochemistry, but these makers are not completely the same as normalmarine makers, moreover, the passageway and obviously increased makers of transgression have not been discovered, so "marine flooding" , " tsunami" and " terrestrial facies" appear, these viewpoints have coexisted for a long time. Penman considers that the question can be solved by 4 ways: ①The structural setting of BohaiBay Basin should be studied thoroughly to conclude possibility of the transgression's passageway. ②Reliability of marine makers provided should be newly considered. ③New and exclusive evidences are required. ④Similar sediment trap s in correlative strata abroad are collected to research contrastively

HTML

Reference (1)

[1]

Research Development and Prospects on Paleogene Sea Transgression in Bohai Bay Basin

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related