Advanced Search

Zhu Lianfang, Lei Huaiyan, Shi Yuxin. COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990, 8(2): 127-134.
Citation: Zhu Lianfang, Lei Huaiyan, Shi Yuxin. COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990, 8(2): 127-134.

COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE

  • Received Date: 1989-04-07
  • Publish Date: 1990-06-10
  • Analysis of grain grade is widely used in geology for studying sedimeust transimition and sedimental environments. Besides the conventioned sieve analysis, there occure some new methods, such as computer-controled IAS-FLUS image analysis instrument and the microscope combined with WDJ.But wich one is the most economically benificial method and how to improver the analytical speed and precision.In this study, some different samples have been analysed with the three methods and the results fiave been coprnared.Some conclusions obtained as follow:1. Sieve analysis is suitable for cohesionless sandestone especially for wind, river, lake-formed sandstone after Cenozic and Mesozoic,2. TAS-PLUS image aualysis instrument is beter for quartz-sandstone, fundamentally cemented saudstone, striped sandstone and differently lighted sandstone. 3, The microscope combined with WDJ is suitable for most kinds of sandstone.Even though it could be widely used. the oberservating is very difficult under microscope and influnced by some manal factions.So, using a suitable method is important for benified sample analysis.
  • [1] (1)郑浚茂,1982,陆源碎屑沉积环境的粒度标志,沉积环境教材之一,武汉地质学院北京研究十部出版社。

    (2)朱莲芳,1982.内陆盆地砂岩体的成因类型及沉积模式,石油地质论文,甘肃人民出版社
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(633) PDF downloads(425) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  1989-04-07
  • Published:  1990-06-10

COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE

Abstract: Analysis of grain grade is widely used in geology for studying sedimeust transimition and sedimental environments. Besides the conventioned sieve analysis, there occure some new methods, such as computer-controled IAS-FLUS image analysis instrument and the microscope combined with WDJ.But wich one is the most economically benificial method and how to improver the analytical speed and precision.In this study, some different samples have been analysed with the three methods and the results fiave been coprnared.Some conclusions obtained as follow:1. Sieve analysis is suitable for cohesionless sandestone especially for wind, river, lake-formed sandstone after Cenozic and Mesozoic,2. TAS-PLUS image aualysis instrument is beter for quartz-sandstone, fundamentally cemented saudstone, striped sandstone and differently lighted sandstone. 3, The microscope combined with WDJ is suitable for most kinds of sandstone.Even though it could be widely used. the oberservating is very difficult under microscope and influnced by some manal factions.So, using a suitable method is important for benified sample analysis.

Zhu Lianfang, Lei Huaiyan, Shi Yuxin. COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990, 8(2): 127-134.
Citation: Zhu Lianfang, Lei Huaiyan, Shi Yuxin. COMPARISION OF THREE ANALYTICAL METHODS OF GRAIN GRADE[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990, 8(2): 127-134.
Reference (1)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return