Advanced Search

Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 365-375.
Citation: Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 365-375.

Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin

  • Publish Date: 2014-04-10
  • The quantitative calculation of sandstone porosity evolution based on casting section data is one of important techniques for  diagenetic change and reservoir simulations. Because of the problems in parameters determination and calculation process, the results are not accurate in many cases. For this reason, based on the analysis of previous  computation process and their errors, the original porosity determination method is decided, and COPL, CEPL and CRPI (corrosional porosity increase) calculation formula are deducted. To the determination of original porosity, Beard and Weyl’s wet packing experiment is more accurate than the method of assigning a constant value for all the samples according to the sedimentary facies or the Scherer’s equation based on the relationship between original porosity and coefficient of sorting. Under the consideration of rock bulk volume’s reduction in the compacting process, COPL, CEPL and CRPI calculation formula are deducted, and the errors in situation that the bulk volume’s reduction is neglected is analysed, and the errors’ extent is calculated. Instead of the method contrasting the intergranular porosity and ΦHe without calculation of CRPI, the approach considering all diagenesis sorts and rock bulk volume’s reduction in the compacting process is established in calculation result accuracy check-out. The application of the above-mentioned calculation methods of sandstone porosity evolution in Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin, is satisfying with 1.1% absolute error and 15.3% relative error of porosity.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040123456
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.8 %FULLTEXT: 8.8 %META: 78.9 %META: 78.9 %PDF: 12.3 %PDF: 12.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.3 %其他: 2.3 %其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %United States: 1.6 %United States: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %东营: 0.6 %东营: 0.6 %中卫: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %儋州: 0.3 %儋州: 0.3 %兰州: 1.3 %兰州: 1.3 %凉山: 0.3 %凉山: 0.3 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %南京市栖霞区: 0.3 %南京市栖霞区: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %成都: 2.9 %成都: 2.9 %新乡: 1.0 %新乡: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 29.9 %芒廷维尤: 29.9 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %西宁: 28.2 %西宁: 28.2 %西安: 3.6 %西安: 3.6 %达州: 0.6 %达州: 0.6 %遂宁: 0.3 %遂宁: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaUnited States上海东营中卫儋州兰州凉山北京南京市栖霞区台州呼和浩特哈尔滨天津宣城广州廊坊张家口成都新乡杭州武汉沈阳深圳温州焦作芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁西安达州遂宁郑州重庆长沙阳泉
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(2121) PDF downloads(1190) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Published:  2014-04-10

Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin

Abstract: The quantitative calculation of sandstone porosity evolution based on casting section data is one of important techniques for  diagenetic change and reservoir simulations. Because of the problems in parameters determination and calculation process, the results are not accurate in many cases. For this reason, based on the analysis of previous  computation process and their errors, the original porosity determination method is decided, and COPL, CEPL and CRPI (corrosional porosity increase) calculation formula are deducted. To the determination of original porosity, Beard and Weyl’s wet packing experiment is more accurate than the method of assigning a constant value for all the samples according to the sedimentary facies or the Scherer’s equation based on the relationship between original porosity and coefficient of sorting. Under the consideration of rock bulk volume’s reduction in the compacting process, COPL, CEPL and CRPI calculation formula are deducted, and the errors in situation that the bulk volume’s reduction is neglected is analysed, and the errors’ extent is calculated. Instead of the method contrasting the intergranular porosity and ΦHe without calculation of CRPI, the approach considering all diagenesis sorts and rock bulk volume’s reduction in the compacting process is established in calculation result accuracy check-out. The application of the above-mentioned calculation methods of sandstone porosity evolution in Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin, is satisfying with 1.1% absolute error and 15.3% relative error of porosity.

Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 365-375.
Citation: Quantitative Calculation of Sandstone Porosity Evolution Based on Thin Section Data: A case study from Chang8 reservoir of Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 365-375.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return