Advanced Search
Volume 40 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

ZHANG XiaoLi, HE JinXian, DONG ShouHua, HUANG YaPing, SHI Shuai, WANG Wei. Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 1676-1690. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110
Citation: ZHANG XiaoLi, HE JinXian, DONG ShouHua, HUANG YaPing, SHI Shuai, WANG Wei. Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 1676-1690. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110

Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area

doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110
Funds:

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2902003

National Natural Science Foundation of China 41702170

  • Received Date: 2022-06-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-08-28
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-10
  • Gallium is enriched in the coal-measure shale of the lower Taiyuan Formation in the Linxing area of the Ordos Basin, with an average content of 24.7 μg/g, but is lower in the northern and southwestern regions of the study area adjacent to the Zijinshan rock mass. The gallium in the coal-measure shale in the study area mainly occurs in kaolinite in the form of isomorphic replacement of aluminum. Alkaline feldspar in the clasts is another significant source of gallium. Elemental geochemical analysis indicates that the granite series of the Yinshan orogenic belt was the main source of gallium-rich shale. The Caledonian North China Craton uplifted slowly and steadily over a long period of time, providing a favorable environment for weathered source rocks to develop gallium-rich provenances. Weathering and depositional conditions are the main conditions for gallium enrichment in shale: a warm, humid climate with intermittent periods of dry, hot climate, together with a predominantly freshwater anoxic reducing sedimentary environment. During diagenesis, the thermal evolution of organic matter in the coal measures released a large amount of organic acid, which dissolved the alkaline feldspar debris and released the gallium contained in it, thus further increasing the gallium content. The tightness of the coal-shale-sandstone system in the coal measures did not allow diagenetic-type enrichment of gallium to continue. The enrichment of gallium in the mud shale in the study area is predominantly terrigenous. Diagenesis and re-formation promoted further gallium enrichment to some extent. The heat generated during emplacement of the rock mass stimulated migration of the low-melting-point gallium, resulting in lower gallium content near the Zijinshan rock mass.
  • [1] 翟明国,吴福元,胡瑞忠,等. 战略性关键金属矿产资源:现状与问题[J]. 中国科学基金,2019,33(2):106-111.

    Zhai Mingguo, Wu Fuyuan, Hu Ruizhong, et al. Critical metal mineral resources: Current research status and scientific issues[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019, 33(2): 106-111.
    [2] 代世峰,刘池洋,赵蕾,等. 煤系中战略性金属矿产资源:意义和挑战[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(5):1743-1749.

    Dai Shifeng, Liu Chiyang, Zhao Lei, et al. Strategic metal resources in coal-bearing strata: Significance and challenges[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(5): 1743-1749.
    [3] 廖家隆,张福强,韦梦蝶,等. 广西晚二叠世典型聚煤盆地中锂、镓丰度及富集因素[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(1):77-84.

    Liao Jialong, Zhang Fuqiang, Wei Mengdie, et al. Lithium and gallium abundance and enrichment factors in typical Late Permian coal-accumulating basin in Guangxi[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2020, 48(1): 77-84.
    [4] 易同生,秦勇,吴艳艳,等. 黔东凯里梁山组煤层及其底板中镓的富集与地质成因[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2007,36(3):330-334.

    Yi Tongsheng, Qin Yong, Wu Yanyan, et al. Gallium accumulation and geological controls in coal seam and its floor from Liangshan Formation, Kaili, eastern Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2007, 36(3): 330-334.
    [5] 陈磊,邵培,熊武候,等. 新疆准东煤田中侏罗统煤系镓元素的分布特征及赋存机理探讨[J]. 地学前缘,2018,25(4):76-85.

    Chen Lei, Shao Pei, Xiong Wuhou, et al. Discussion on distribution and occurrence mechanism of gallium in the Middle Jurassic coal-bearing strata of the eastern Junggar coalfield, Xinjiang[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(4): 76-85.
    [6] 刘帮军,林明月,褚光琛. 山西平朔矿区4#煤中镓的分布规律与富集机理?[J]. 中国煤炭,2014,40(11):25-29.

    Liu Bangjun, Lin Mingyue, Chu Guangchen. Distribution law and enrichment mechanism of Ga in 4# coal seam in Pingshuo mining area in Shanxi province[J]. China Coal, 2014, 40(11): 25-29.
    [7] 王钧漪,王文峰,李健,等. 元素锗镓铀在大同煤田北部煤中的赋存特征[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2010,38(2):117-121,85.

    Wang Junyi, Wang Wenfeng, Li Jian, et al. Deposit features of Ge, Ga and U elements in northern part of Datong coalfield[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2010, 38(2): 117-121, 85.
    [8] 代世峰, 任德贻, 李生盛. 内蒙古准格尔超大型镓矿床的发现[J]. 科学通报,2006,51(2):177-185.

    Dai Shifeng, Ren Deyi, Li Shengsheng. Discovery of the superlarge gallium ore deposit in Jungar, Inner Mongolia, North China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(2): 177-185.
    [9] 代世峰,任德贻,李生盛,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘准格尔煤田煤中超常富集勃姆石的发现[J]. 地质学报,2006,80(2):294-300.

    Dai Shifeng, Ren Deyi, Li Shengsheng, et al. A discovery of extremely-enriched boehmite from coal in the Junger coalfield, the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(2): 294-300.
    [10] 张复新,王立社. 内蒙古准格尔黑岱沟超大型煤型镓矿床的形成与物质来源[J]. 中国地质,2009,36(2):417-423.

    Zhang Fuxin, Wang Lishe. The formation and material sources of the superlarge Hada Gol Ga-bearing coal deposit in Jungar Banner, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology in China, 2009, 36(2): 417-423.
    [11] 王文峰,秦勇,刘新花,等. 内蒙古准格尔煤田煤中镓的分布赋存与富集成因[J]. 中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2011,41(2):181-196.

    Wang Wenfeng, Qin Yong, Liu Xinhua, et al. Distribution, occurrence and enrichment causes of gallium in coals from the Jungar coalfield, Inner Mongolia[J]. Science China (Seri. D): Earth Sciences, 2011, 41(2): 181-196.
    [12] 吴国代,王文峰,秦勇,等. 准格尔煤中镓的分布特征和富集机理分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2009,37(4):117-120.

    Wu Guodai, Wang Wenfeng, Qin Yong, et al. Analysis on distribution characteristic and enrichment mechanism of elements Ga in Junger coalfield[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2009, 37(4): 117-120.
    [13] 秦勇,王文峰,程爱国,等. 首批煤炭国家规划矿区煤中镓的成矿前景[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2009,21(1):17-21,26.

    Qin Yong, Wang Wenfeng, Cheng Aiguo, et al. Study of ore-forming potential of gallium in coal for the first group of state programmed mining districts[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2009, 21(1): 17-21, 26.
    [14] 张勇,秦身钧,杨晶晶,等. 煤中镓的地球化学研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报,2014,33(5):166-169,175.

    Zhang Yong, Qin Shenjun, Yang Jingjing, et al. Progress in geochemistry of gallium in coal[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(5): 166-169, 175.
    [15] 刘建婧,姚素玲,朱本康,等. 煤中镓元素富集规律特性研究[J]. 中国矿业,2020,29(1):150-156.

    Liu Jianjing, Yao Suling, Zhu Benkang, et al. Study on enrichment characteristics of Gallium in coal[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(1): 150-156.
    [16] 袁亮,张通,赵毅鑫,等. 煤与共伴生资源精准协调开采:以鄂尔多斯盆地煤与伴生特种稀有金属精准协调开采为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(3):449-459.

    Yuan Liang, Zhang Tong, Zhao Yixin, et al. Precise coordinated mining of coal and associated resources: A case of environmental coordinated mining of coal and associated rare metal in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2017, 46(3): 449-459.
    [17] 师晶,黄文辉,吕晨航,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界泥岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油学报,2018,39(8):876-889.

    Shi Jing, Huang Wenhui, Chenhang Lü, et al. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of the Upper Paleozoic mudstones from Linxing area in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(8): 876-889.
    [18] 屈晓荣,李俊,孙彩蓉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘柳林地区煤系泥页岩稀土元素地球化学特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(4):1083-1093.

    Qu Xiaorong, Li Jun, Sun Cairong, et al. Geochemistry characteristics of rare earth elements in the Late Paleozoic black shale from eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(4): 1083-1093.
    [19] 孙彩蓉,唐书恒,张松航,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘隰县地区煤层顶底板元素地球化学特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(增刊2):502-509.

    Sun Cairong, Tang Shuheng, Zhang Songhang, et al. Geochemical characteristics of coal seam roof and floor elements in Xixian region of eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(Suppl.2): 502-509.
    [20] 李增学,韩美莲,魏久传,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界高分辨率层序划分与煤聚积规律分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(1):5-12.

    Li Zengxue, Han Meilian, Wei Jiuchuan, et al. Analysis of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and coal accumulation law of Upper Paleozoic Erathem Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2008, 32(1): 5-12.
    [21] 鲁静,邵龙义,孙斌,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘石炭—二叠纪煤系层序—古地理与聚煤作用[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(5):747-754.

    Lu Jing, Shao Longyi, Sun Bin, et al. Sequence-paleogeography and coal accumulation of Carboniferous-Permian coal measures in the eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(5): 747-754.
    [22] 王双明. 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化和构造控煤作用[J]. 地质通报,2011,30(4):544-552.

    Wang Shuangming. Ordos Basin tectonic evolution and structural control of coal[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(4): 544-552.
    [23] 郭英海,刘焕杰,陈孟晋. 鄂尔多斯地区晚古生代沉积演化[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2004.

    Guo Yinghai, Liu Huanjie, Chen Mengjin. Late Paleozoic sedimentary evolution in Ordos area[M]. Xuzhou: China University of mining and Technology Press, 2004.
    [24] 吴鹏,高计县,郭俊超,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区太原组桥头砂岩层序地层及沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(1):66-76.

    Wu Peng, Gao Jixian, Guo Junchao, et al. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary characteristic analysis of Qiaotou sandstone of Tayuan Fm in Linxing area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(1): 66-76.
    [25] Wedepohl K H. Environmental influences on the chemical composition of shales and clays[M]//Ahrens L H, Press F, Runcorn S K, et al. Physics and chemistry of the earth. Oxford: Pergamon, 1971: 307-331.
    [26] 刘英俊,曹励明,李兆麟,等. 元素地球化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1984:378-386.

    Liu Yingjun, Cao Liming, Li Zhaolin, et al. Elemental geochemistry[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1984: 378-386.
    [27] 孙志国,姚德,梁宏峰,等. 多金属结核微层中元素的富集系数特征及其成因[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,1996,16(2):65-74.

    Sun Zhiguo, Yao De, Liang Hongfeng, et al. Characteristics of element concentration coeficient in microlauers of polymetallic nodules[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 1996, 16(2): 65-74.
    [28] Ross D J K, Bustin R M. Investigating the use of sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of thermally mature organic-rich strata: Examples from the Devonian-Mississippian shales, western Canadian Sedimentary Basin[J]. Chemical Geology, 2009, 260(1/2): 1-19.
    [29] 吴泓辰,何金先,张晓丽,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区太原组页岩孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 新疆石油地质,2018,39(5):549-554.

    Wu Hongchen, He Jinxian, Zhang Xiaoli, et al. Pore structure and its fractal features of the shale in Taiyuan Formation of Linxing area, Ordos Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(5): 549-554.
    [30] 王国茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界物源及层序岩相古地理研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2011.

    Wang Guoru. The study of sources and senquence-lithofaces palaeogeography of Upper Palaeozoic, Basin[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
    [31] 薛纯琦,吴建光,钟建华,等. 海陆交互相沉积泥页岩发育特征研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区太原组为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(4):870-881.

    Xue Chunqi, Wu Jianguang, Zhong Jianhua, et al. Characteristics of the marine-terrigenous interdepositional shale: A case study of Taiyuan Formation in Linxing area of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(4): 870-881.
    [32] Chalmers G R, Bustin R M, Power I M. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6): 1099-1119.
    [33] Bau M, Dulski P. Comparing yttrium and rare earths in hydrothermal fluids from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: Implications for Y and REE behaviour during near-vent mixing and for the Y/Ho ratio of Proterozoic seawater[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999, 155(1/2): 77-90.
    [34] 任江波,邓希光,邓义楠,等. 中国富钴结壳合同区海水的稀土元素特征及其意义[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(10):3529-3540.

    Ren Jiangbo, Deng Xiguang, Deng Yinan, et al. Rare earth element characteristics and its geological implications for seawater from cobalt-rich ferromanganese crust exploration contract area of China[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(10): 3529-3540.
    [35] Haskin L A, Haskin M A, Frey F A, et al. Relative and absolute terrestrial abundances of the rare earths[M]//Ahrens L H. Origin and distribution of the elements. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1968: 889-912.
    [36] 王中刚,于学元,赵振华. 稀土元素地球化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1989.

    Wang Zhonggang, Yu Xueyuan, Zhao Zhenhua. Geochemistry of rare earth elements[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1989.
    [37] Allègre C J, Minster J F. Quantitative models of trace element behavior in magmatic processes[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1978, 38(1): 1-25.
    [38] 郭英海,刘焕杰,权彪,等. 鄂尔多斯地区晚古生代沉积体系及古地理演化[J]. 沉积学报,1998,16(3):44-51.

    Guo Yinghai, Liu Huanjie, Quan Biao, et al. Late Paleozoic sedimentary system and paleogeographic evolution of Ordos area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1998, 16(3): 44-51.
    [39] 邓军,王庆飞,黄定华,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地基底演化及其对盖层控制作用[J]. 地学前缘,2005,12(3):91-99.

    Deng Jun, Wang Qingfei, Huang Dinghua, et al. Basement evolution of the Ordos Basin and its constraint on cap rock[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3): 91-99.
    [40] 陈全红,李文厚,刘昊伟,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上石炭统—中二叠统砂岩物源分析[J]. 古地理学报,2009,11(6):629-640.

    Chen Quanhong, Li Wenhou, Liu Haowei, et al. Provenance analysis of sandstone of the Upper Carboniferous to Middle Permian in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(6): 629-640.
    [41] 陈全红,李文厚,郭艳琴,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地早二叠世聚煤环境与成煤模式分析[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):70-76.

    Chen Quanhong, Li Wenhou, Guo Yanqin, et al. The analysis of coal accumulating environment and coal forming models in Early Permian, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(1): 70-76.
    [42] 郭艳琴,李文厚,郭彬程,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地沉积体系与古地理演化[J]. 古地理学报,2019,21(2):293-320.

    Guo Yanqin, Li Wenhou, Guo Bincheng, et al. Sedimentary systems and palaeogeography evolution of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(2): 293-320.
    [43] 陈全红,李文厚,胡孝林,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地晚古生代沉积岩源区构造背景及物源分析[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(7):1150-1162.

    Chen Quanhong, Li Wenhou, Hu Xiaolin, et al. Tectonic setting and provenance analysis of Late Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(7): 1150-1162.
    [44] 马收先,孟庆任,武国利,等. 内蒙古隆起晚古生代构造隆升的沉积记录[J]. 地质学报,2014,88(10):1771-1789.

    Ma Shouxian, Meng Qingren, Wu Guoli, et al. Late Paleozoic exhumation of the Inner Mongolia paleo-uplift: Evidences from sedimentary records[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(10): 1771-1789.
    [45] 贾浪波,钟大康,孙海涛,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地本溪组沉积物物源探讨及其构造意义[J]. 沉积学报,2019,37(5):1087-1103.

    Jia Langbo, Zhong Dakang, Sun Haitao, et al. Sediment provenance analysis and tectonic implication of the Benxi Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 1087-1103.
    [46] 何登发,包洪平,开百泽,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及其邻区关键构造变革期次及其特征[J]. 石油学报,2021,42(10):1255-1269.

    He Dengfa, Bao Hongping, Baize Kai, et al. Critical tectonic modification periods and its geologic features of Ordos Basin and adjacent area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1255-1269.
    [47] 郭艳琴,赵灵生,郭彬程,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘地区下二叠统沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报,2021,23(1):65-80.

    Guo Yanqin, Zhao Lingsheng, Guo Bincheng, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Lower Permian in Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 23(1): 65-80.
    [48] 翟咏荷,何登发,开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区早二叠世构造—沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J/OL]. 地学前缘,doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.70 .

    Zhai Yonghe, He Dengfa, Baize Kai. Tectonic-depositional environment and prototype basin evolution of the Ordos Basin during the Early Permian[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.70 .
    [49] 褚光琛. 准格尔煤田煤中稀有金属富集机理的实验模拟[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学,2015.

    Chu Guangchen. Simulated experiment on enrichment mechanism of rare mental in coal of Jungar coalfield[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2015.
    [50] Bhatia M R, Crook K A W. Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1986, 92(2): 181-193.
    [51] Gernon T M, Hincks T K, Merdith A S, et al. Global chemical weathering dominated by continental arcs since the mid-Palaeozoic[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14(9): 690-696.
    [52] 尹锦涛,俞雨溪,姜呈馥,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地张家滩页岩元素地球化学特征及与有机质富集的关系[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(6):1544-1556.

    Yin Jintao, Yu Yuxi, Jiang Chengfu, et al. Relationship between element geochemical characteristic and organic matter enrichment in Zhangjiatan shale of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(6): 1544-1556.
    [53] McLennan S M, Hemming S, McDaniel D K, et al. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics[M]//Johnsson M J, Basu A. Processes controlling the composition of clastic sediments. New York: Geological Society of America, 1993: 21-40.
    [54] 宋朔,刘招君,孙平昌,等. 红色泥岩层系地球化学特征及物源分析:以松辽盆地东南隆起区上白垩统姚家组为例[J]. 世界地质,2015,34(3):774-785.

    Song Shuo, Liu Zhaojun, Sun Pingchang, et al. Geochemical characteristics and sediment provenance analysis of red mudstone formation: A case study of Upper Cretaceous Yaojia Formation of southeastern uplift area in Songliao Basin[J]. World Geology, 2015, 34(3): 774-785.
    [55] Taylor S R, McClennan S M. The continental crust: Its composition and evolution: An examination of the geochemical record preserved in sedimentary rocks[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1985.
    [56] 刘英俊. 华南某些花岗岩类气成—热液蚀变中镓的地球化学[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版),1965,9(2):236-248.

    Liu Yingjun. Geochemistry of gallium in some granitoids of South China[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 1965, 9(2): 236-248.
    [57] Nesbitt H W, Young G M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites[J]. Nature, 1982, 299(5885): 715-717.
    [58] Fedo C M, Nesbitt H W, Young G M. Unraveling the effects of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications for paleoweathering conditions and provenance[J]. Geology, 1995, 23(10): 921-924.
    [59] 徐小涛,邵龙义. 利用泥质岩化学蚀变指数分析物源区风化程度时的限制因素[J]. 古地理学报,2018,20(3):515-522.

    Xu Xiaotao, Shao Longyi. Limiting factors in utilization of chemical index of alteration of mudstones to quantify the degree of weathering in provenance[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 20(3): 515-522.
    [60] 张天福,孙立新,张云,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘侏罗纪延安组、直罗组泥岩微量、稀土元素地球化学特征及其古沉积环境意义[J]. 地质学报,2016,90(12):3454-3472.

    Zhang Tianfu, Sun Lixin, Zhang Yun, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Jurassic Yan’an and Zhiluo Formations in the northern margin of Ordos Basin and their paleoenvironmental implications[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(12): 3454-3472.
    [61] 邓宏文,钱凯. 沉积地球化学与环境分析[M]. 兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社,1993:95-104.

    Deng Hongwen, Qian Kai. Sedimentary geochemistry and environmental analysis[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1993: 95-104.
    [62] 范玉海,屈红军,王辉,等. 微量元素分析在判别沉积介质环境中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地西部中区晚三叠世为例[J]. 中国地质,2012,39(2):382-389.

    Fan Yuhai, Qu Hongjun, Wang Hui, et al. The application of trace elements analysis to identifying sedimentary media environment: A case study of Late Triassic strata in the middle part of western Ordos Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2012, 39(2): 382-389.
    [63] 梁文君,肖传桃,肖凯,等. 藏北安多晚侏罗世古环境、古气候与地球化学元素关系研究[J]. 中国地质,2015,42(4):1079-1091.

    Liang Wenjun, Xiao Chuantao, Xiao Kai, et al. The relationship of Late Jurassic paleoenvironment and paleoclimate with geochemical elements in Amdo country of northern Tibet[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(4): 1079-1091.
    [64] 李广之,胡斌,邓天龙,等. 微量元素V和Ni的油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):13-17.

    Li Guangzhi, Hu Bin, Deng Tianlong, et al. Petroleum geological significance of microelements V and Ni[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2008, 19(1): 13-17.
    [65] Dill H. Metallogenesis of Early Paleozoic graptolite shales from the Graefenthal Horst (northern Bavaria-Federal Republic of Germany)[J]. Economic Geology, 1986, 81(4): 889-903.
    [66] Dill H, Teschner M, Wehner H. Petrography, inorganic and organic geochemistry of Lower Permian carbonaceous fan sequences (“Brandschiefer Series”)-Federal Republic of Germany: Constraints to their paleogeography and assessment of their source rock potential[J]. Chemical Geology, 1988, 67(3/4): 307-325.
    [67] Patterson J H, Ramsden A R, Dale L S, et al. Geochemistry and mineralogical residences of trace elements in oil shales from Julia Creek, Queensland, Australia[J]. Chemical Geology, 1986, 55(1/2): 1-16.
    [68] 金明,李妩巍. 乌兰花地区下白垩统、上新统岩石地球化学特征及其古气候演变[J]. 铀矿地质,2003,19(6):349-354.

    Jin Ming, Li Wuwei. Petrogeochemical characteristics of Lower Cretaceous and Pliocene rocks and paleoclimate evolution in Wulanhua region[J]. Uranium Geology, 2003, 19(6): 349-354.
    [69] 田景春,张翔. 沉积地球化学[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2016:63-77.

    Tian Jingchun, Zhang Xiang. Sedimentary geochemistry[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2016: 63-77.
    [70] 文华国,郑荣才,唐飞,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地耿湾地区长6段古盐度恢复与古环境分析[J]. 矿物岩石,2008,28(1):114-120.

    Wen Huaguo, Zheng Rongcai, Tang Fei, et al. Reconstruction and analysis of paleosalanity and paleoenvironment of the Chang 6 member in the Gengwan region, Ordos Basin[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2008, 28(1): 114-120.
    [71] 王敏芳,焦养泉,王正海,等. 沉积环境中古盐度的恢复:以吐哈盆地西南缘水西沟群泥岩为例[J]. 新疆石油地质,2005,26(6):719-722.

    Wang Minfang, Jiao Yangquan, Wang Zhenghai, et al. Recovery paleosalinity in sedimentary environment: An example of mudstone in Shuixigou Group, southwestern margin of Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2005, 26(6): 719-722.
    [72] 许璟,蒲仁海,杨林,等. 塔里木盆地石炭系泥岩沉积时的古盐度分析[J]. 沉积学报,2010,28(3):509-517.

    Xu Jing, Pu Renhai, Yang Lin, et al. The palaeosalinity analysis of Carboniferous mudstone, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(3): 509-517.
    [73] 钱利军,陈洪德,林良彪,等. 四川盆地西缘地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组地球化学特征及其环境意义[J]. 沉积学报,2012,30(6):1061-1071.

    Qian Lijun, Chen Hongde, Lin Liangbiao, et al. Geochemical characteristics and environmental implications of Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, western margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(6): 1061-1071.
    [74] 王益友,吴萍. 江浙海岸带沉积物的地球化学标志[J]. 同济大学学报,1983(4):79-87.

    Wang Yiyou, Wu Ping. Geochemical criteria of sediments in the coastal area of Jiangsu and Zhejang provinces[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1983(4): 79-87.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(11)  / Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(149) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  2022-06-12
  • Revised:  2022-08-28
  • Published:  2022-12-10

Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area

doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110
Funds:

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2902003

National Natural Science Foundation of China 41702170

Abstract: Gallium is enriched in the coal-measure shale of the lower Taiyuan Formation in the Linxing area of the Ordos Basin, with an average content of 24.7 μg/g, but is lower in the northern and southwestern regions of the study area adjacent to the Zijinshan rock mass. The gallium in the coal-measure shale in the study area mainly occurs in kaolinite in the form of isomorphic replacement of aluminum. Alkaline feldspar in the clasts is another significant source of gallium. Elemental geochemical analysis indicates that the granite series of the Yinshan orogenic belt was the main source of gallium-rich shale. The Caledonian North China Craton uplifted slowly and steadily over a long period of time, providing a favorable environment for weathered source rocks to develop gallium-rich provenances. Weathering and depositional conditions are the main conditions for gallium enrichment in shale: a warm, humid climate with intermittent periods of dry, hot climate, together with a predominantly freshwater anoxic reducing sedimentary environment. During diagenesis, the thermal evolution of organic matter in the coal measures released a large amount of organic acid, which dissolved the alkaline feldspar debris and released the gallium contained in it, thus further increasing the gallium content. The tightness of the coal-shale-sandstone system in the coal measures did not allow diagenetic-type enrichment of gallium to continue. The enrichment of gallium in the mud shale in the study area is predominantly terrigenous. Diagenesis and re-formation promoted further gallium enrichment to some extent. The heat generated during emplacement of the rock mass stimulated migration of the low-melting-point gallium, resulting in lower gallium content near the Zijinshan rock mass.

ZHANG XiaoLi, HE JinXian, DONG ShouHua, HUANG YaPing, SHI Shuai, WANG Wei. Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 1676-1690. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110
Citation: ZHANG XiaoLi, HE JinXian, DONG ShouHua, HUANG YaPing, SHI Shuai, WANG Wei. Enrichment Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of the Strategic Metal Element Gallium in Coal-measure Shale, Lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing Area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 1676-1690. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.110
  • 战略性金属矿产是国民经济持续发展和国防安全的基础[1]。煤系物质组成和形成过程复杂,在其特定的地质作用下,可以富集战略性金属元素。煤系战略性金属矿产研究已成为世界产煤国家的前沿课题[2]。国内许多学者在我国广西[3]、贵州[4]、新疆[5]、山西[67]和内蒙古[812]等多个地区开展了煤中镓的富集机理研究,获得了重要成果[1315]。煤系泥页岩,作为与煤共伴生的沉积岩系,与煤具有极其相似的沉积和成岩环境。然而,镓的成矿潜力和地质主控因素研究中,针对煤系泥页岩的成果较少,有待进一步探索研究。鄂尔多斯盆地煤炭资源丰富,储量占全国的33.6%,与石油、天然气和稀有金属等矿产资源相互伴生和叠加,是一个综合性资源盆地[16]。前人针对鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥页岩中稀土和微量元素特征开展基础研究工作,探讨其在沉积环境与物源分析等方面的指示意义[1719]。然而由于关注点不同,前人在鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区开展的研究工作聚焦于聚煤规律和煤系气资源评价等方面[2021],对煤系泥页岩中镓的富集成因尚缺乏系统研究。临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩明显富集镓元素。笔者通过研究区典型钻井中煤系暗色泥页岩的主量、微量及稀土元素地球化学特征的研究,系统地分析煤系泥页岩的物源、沉积环境和成岩阶段特征,厘清煤系特殊的沉积环境、成岩环境与泥页岩中镓元素富集的时间和空间匹配关系,探讨泥页岩中镓富集特征和成因,为煤系战略性金属矿产的赋存状态、分布规律与机理研究工作提供参考。

  • 鄂尔多斯盆地总面积约为25×104 km2,是我国第二大沉积盆地,由6个次一级构造单元组成,分别是:西缘冲断带、天环坳陷、伊盟隆起、陕北斜坡、渭北隆起、晋西挠褶带[22]。临兴地区位于晋西挠褶带中北部(图1),受构造—沉积背景的控制,经历了快速、不连续的海侵过程以及缓慢、相对稳定持续的海退过程。

    Figure 1.  Study area location, well distribution and lithological profile

    临兴地区隶属于华北地层区,太原组是华北地层区主要的含煤地层之一,厚34~77 m,与本溪组整合接触,是8#、9#煤层之顶到“北岔沟砂岩”之底的一套煤系[2324]。临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩总厚度为17~57 m,平均约为30 m。岩性包括黑色炭质泥页岩、灰—灰黑色粉砂质泥岩、灰黑色泥岩等,泥页岩岩心中可见植物叶片化石,发育水平层理和波状层理。总体特征为单层厚度相对较薄而层数较多,在垂向上与砂岩及煤层相互叠置(图1)。

  • 泥页岩样品来自鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区13口钻井的岩心样,其中有10口钻井各采集1件样品,有2口钻井各采集3件样品,有1口钻井采集2件样品,共计18件,岩性均为暗色泥页岩。样品钻井位置主要分布于区内紫金山岩体的北侧,部分样品钻井位置位于紫金山岩体的西南侧。采样层位均属于太原组下段,即对应于图1中岩性柱状图里的太原组太2段。对泥页岩样品开展了有机碳含量、主量元素、微量元素和稀土元素测试分析。有机碳含量、微量元素和稀土元素测试分析在中国科学院油气资源研究重点实验室完成,其中有机碳含量分析测试在CS-344型碳硫分析仪上进行。微量元素和稀土元素测试分析在ELANDRC-e型电感耦合等离子体质谱仪(ICP-MS)上进行。主量元素测试分析在甘肃省西部矿产资源重点实验室的Agilent720Axial型电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱仪(ICP-OES)上进行。

  • 研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的有机碳变化范围较大(表1),碳含量介于0.41%~4.93%,平均为2.32%。样品硫含量介于0.02%~1.68%,平均为0.42%,且分布具有明显的两段性:低硫段0.02%~0.41%和高硫段1.21%~1.68%。研究区大部分样品(15个)属于低硫区域(硫含量0.02%~0.41%),只有3个样品硫含量较高(1.21%~1.68%)。

    样品编号TOCSP2O5Fe2O3SiO2Al2O3MgOCaONa2OK2OCaO/(MgO+Al2O3)
    V1-10.410.400.131.7263.1324.710.140.100.215.630.03
    V1-21.120.370.165.4160.4820.930.860.770.303.500.04
    V1-31.481.680.1313.2858.9816.340.350.420.241.780.07
    V4-12.420.320.141.9758.4926.870.230.200.132.000.03
    V5-33.610.120.121.6162.6920.420.390.370.204.070.05
    V10-13.050.070.060.9961.2121.540.170.140.132.000.04
    V16-21.851.210.095.0761.4722.830.310.110.282.760.02
    V17-11.551.200.119.0761.8620.960.830.880.363.170.05
    V20-14.000.290.052.6059.8024.090.420.470.535.140.05
    V20-24.930.190.121.5561.4120.490.330.340.163.390.05
    V20-221.810.020.030.6162.8417.570.240.110.241.890.03
    V21-10.610.390.171.7061.5320.140.200.340.113.520.08
    V22-11.820.310.062.0063.0815.900.290.120.181.600.03
    V27-11.030.200.162.4163.4821.870.460.390.295.100.04
    V28-24.070.050.040.8657.8428.960.130.110.185.480.01
    V33-12.600.380.103.5358.9026.590.790.190.155.300.01
    V36-12.390.350.136.4959.1420.770.820.790.213.120.05
    V36-113.080.030.041.1762.1923.050.180.140.132.020.03
  • 主量元素分析显示研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的主要成分为SiO2、Al2O3、Fe2O3和K2O,4种成分的总含量高达82.9%~95.2%(表1)。其中,SiO2含量最高,含量介于57.8%~63.5%,平均为61.0%;Al2O3含量次之,含量介于15.9%~29.0%,平均为22.1%;Fe2O3的非均质性强,含量介于0.6%~10.3%,平均为3.5%;K2O的含量介于1.6%~5.6%,平均为3.4%。除了这4种成分,太原组下段煤系泥页岩中含有少量的Na2O(含量介于0.1%~0.5%,平均为0.2%)、MgO(含量介于0.1%~0.9%,平均为0.4%)、CaO(含量介于0.1%~0.8%,平均为0.3%)、TiO2(含量介于0.7%~1.8%,平均为1.2%)和P2O5(含量介于0.03%~0.16%,平均为0.10%)。

  • 微量元素分析结果显示(表2),研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的Li、Co和Cu元素含量波动最大,其含量最大值和最小值相差40倍以上;其次为Ni、Zn、Mo和Cd,最大值与最小值相差10~40倍;再次是Cs和Hf,最大值与最小值相差5~10倍;Be、V、Cr、Ga、Ge、Rb、Sr、Zr、Nb、Sn、Ba、Tl、W、Ta、Pb、Bi和U含量较稳定,最大值与最小值相差1~5倍。

    样品编号LiVCrCoNiGaSrZrSr/BaδUV/(V+Ni)Sr/CuV/CrNi/CoTh-HfTh/U
    V1-145.8167.4544.210.855.4525.80153.06184.920.790.860.9385.221.536.433.974.46
    V1-216.62108.0857.5317.9922.4423.62512.87369.301.080.810.8341.621.881.258.994.91
    V1-326.3395.3555.8622.0030.0122.89258.38328.590.660.900.7612.511.711.361.754.10
    V4-152.50147.3379.8716.7962.8426.66169.32231.520.320.790.7016.121.843.746.695.11
    V5-349.72116.7953.7718.5433.5223.98154.35183.800.340.810.784.922.171.819.984.94
    V10-155.18127.3366.0111.8645.8023.36233.89257.361.130.890.7420.781.933.863.724.19
    V16-247.38108.7360.8521.5731.3925.06153.21276.820.400.850.786.311.791.467.124.52
    V17-139.51138.8273.8728.3238.6824.86190.76269.310.360.850.7815.751.881.376.464.47
    V20-151.1794.4749.4516.3033.7524.4899.35173.530.280.890.742.511.912.074.564.16
    V20-250.5390.8943.6813.9029.0524.33101.46194.350.270.850.763.512.082.099.464.52
    V20-2242.41152.5282.9819.3864.0223.03175.30172.670.490.860.7013.131.843.306.874.39
    V21-120.1582.2833.666.7325.0121.92807.0378.342.141.060.7789.112.443.723.772.96
    V22-188.52100.9267.4112.2223.6920.5582.17290.710.260.910.813.151.501.945.353.96
    V27-121.8572.6439.793.817.9123.23132.23240.580.320.840.906.301.832.0819.194.65
    V28-241.8859.6434.445.8216.3126.40201.4595.380.900.880.799.441.732.8010.484.26
    V33-1117.1697.5766.608.6428.3727.1663.28457.440.170.820.775.821.463.287.114.83
    V36-136.12128.9354.119.2726.4623.51139.72168.960.360.860.834.142.382.8514.494.38
    V36-1145.88132.3076.3111.6518.2822.31122.40367.880.370.920.884.511.731.578.123.88

    将研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的微量元素与平均页岩[25]进行对比,得到研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的微量元素富集特征。结果显示,研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中Ga、Hf、Bi、Zr、Pb和Th富集;Cr、Co、Cu、Zn、Rb、Sr、Mo、Sn、Ba、Ta、Ni和Cd亏损明显。其他元素接近平均页岩元素丰度。

  • 研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中的稀土总量(ΣREE)分布在97.10~535.27 μg/g之间,平均值为277.42 μg/g,是大陆上地壳[26]稀土平均含量(ΣREE=146.4 μg/g)的1.9倍,是平均页岩[25]的1.4倍,表现出REE富集特征。轻重稀土元素之比LREE/HREE(L/H)为9.56~33.68,平均值为16.09,比上地壳L/H比值(9.5)大,LaN/LuN为1.80~3.27,均大于1。δCe介于0.88~1.13,平均值为0.98;δEu介于0.62~1.11,平均值为0.89(表3)。

    样品编号LaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLuY
    V1-123.8944.204.5514.122.210.351.790.312.020.411.310.221.490.2310.71
    V1-2136.91266.3724.1379.3210.912.206.910.773.480.591.660.251.550.2413.86
    V1-347.8995.2010.7039.696.501.325.230.724.100.762.200.342.220.3419.20
    V4-155.40119.6211.9040.716.341.004.560.724.150.792.440.412.640.4019.25
    V5-370.62138.8615.2550.168.821.466.741.056.001.083.150.493.110.4626.37
    V10-151.54104.1311.8739.547.341.285.970.945.300.982.910.473.090.4724.21
    V16-278.46157.2016.3757.448.731.706.460.915.200.972.770.422.660.4124.37
    V17-161.82125.2613.3547.387.931.706.920.995.631.043.000.463.030.4727.27
    V20-148.3693.9910.5237.766.231.215.040.754.420.842.420.372.450.3720.97
    V20-260.40122.9013.1646.547.781.466.190.895.010.912.610.392.480.3823.80
    V20-2248.88101.7810.1933.215.070.953.870.593.650.732.240.362.400.3718.75
    V21-134.8369.267.3724.344.180.743.020.472.600.481.420.221.370.2012.18
    V22-152.10100.8211.9840.497.501.185.910.975.771.113.470.603.970.6025.34
    V27-170.62177.9418.0163.0211.371.357.951.175.941.002.790.442.640.3722.30
    V28-269.25148.6315.1354.548.891.706.230.783.900.681.910.281.800.2917.11
    V33-159.10101.9410.3632.275.290.764.360.764.640.882.610.412.600.4021.69
    V36-191.87152.6014.0544.916.101.254.560.643.720.702.050.311.900.2816.38
    V36-1179.99178.9515.8051.178.311.425.950.864.590.832.370.362.190.3219.21
  • 研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中微量元素测试结果显示(表2),泥页岩中镓元素(Ga)含量介于20.55~30.35 μg/g,平均值为24.7 μg/g,大于上地壳(17.5 μg/g[26])和平均页岩(19 μg/g[25])中镓的含量,与邻近区域的准格尔煤中镓含量相近,具有镓富集特点,略低于镓工业边界品位(30 μg/g)[2]

    富集系数可以反映元素的富集程度[27]。本文将富集系数(K)定义为研究区泥页岩中镓元素含量值与上地壳中镓元素平均丰度值的比值。富集系数按大小可将元素分成6类:极富集(K≥2),较富集(1.5≤K<2),弱富集(1.0≤K<1.5),弱亏损(0.5≤K<1),较亏损(0.25≤K<0.5),弱富集(0≤K<0.25)[27]。本文研究样品镓元素的富集系数(K)分布在1.2~1.6,平均富集系数(K)为1.4,总体上属于弱富集。

    太原组下段煤系泥页岩中镓元素在研究区内平面分布呈一定规律性(图2),具体表现为:紫金山岩体以北的研究区,随着靠近紫金山岩体,镓含量具有由北向南逐渐降低的趋势;紫金山岩体西南部的研究区,沿着靠近紫金山岩体的方向,镓含量也具有降低的趋势。这是因为镓的熔点较低,紫金山岩体的侵位导致镓在高温作用下发生了由高温区向低温区的迁移作用。由于紫金山岩体规模较小,岩体的温度效应对镓含量分布的影响只涉及了岩体周边较小的范围。

    Figure 2.  Distribution of gallium in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

    研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的镓含量与邻区准格尔煤中镓含量相近[8],而准格尔煤中镓具有较好成矿前景已经取得共识[89,1112]。临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩总厚度大(平均约为30 m)、分布广,镓含量较高的煤系泥页岩总体发育规模大,其中赋含的镓元素资源量规模也大,具有较好的潜在成矿前景。

  • 镓元素是亲石元素,分散性强,经常以类质同象替代的形式赋存在矿物中。煤中镓主要以类质同象取代铝的形式存在含铝元素的高岭石、勃姆石、长石等矿物中[9,28]。通过XRD、扫描电镜等实验,可以明确识别出研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中发育较高含量的高岭石、长石。研究样品中镓含量与Al2O3存在较好的正相关性(图3a),相关系数为0.681,这指示富铝的高岭石等黏土矿物是镓元素的主要赋存矿物。研究样品中镓元素与K2O存在正相关性(图3b),相关的系数为0.293。煤系泥页岩中的钾元素主要由碱性长石和伊利石等含钾的黏土矿物提供,镓元素与K2O存在正相关性则说明了泥页岩中的碱性长石和伊利石等黏土矿物也是镓元素的重要赋存矿物。

    Figure 3.  Correlation of gallium content in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area with (a) Al2O3, (b) K2O

    由上述可知,泥页岩中镓元素的富集与泥页岩中矿物成分关系密切。X射线衍射分析结果显示[29],研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的黏土矿物平均含量为52%,石英平均含量为38%,长石平均含量为7%,碳酸盐矿物平均含量为5%。黏土矿物主要由高岭石、伊蒙混层、伊利石以及绿泥石组成,其中高岭石相对含量为21%~58%,平均含量为35.25%[29]。前文提到,黏土矿物中的高岭石是煤系泥页岩中镓元素最主要的赋存矿物之一,研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中具有较高含量的高岭石,这为镓元素的富集提供了重要的物质基础。

  • 由于煤系中的镓元素主要赋存在高岭石、勃姆石等矿物中。通过重矿物分析等方法,发现临兴地区太原组的物源为陆源输入,来自北部阴山古陆剥蚀区[30]。临兴地区太原组煤系泥页岩有机质类型以III型为主[31],也反映了陆源有机质输入为主。除陆源供给外,火山碎屑、海底热液、海水及海洋生物等也是沉积物的重要来源。稀土元素的化学性质与分异行为均比较特殊,从源岩到沉积物,分布模式变化并不明显,并且稀土及部分微量元素的比值在沉积和变质作用过程中具有较好的抗迁移性,因而是较好的物源指示剂[32]。研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩样品中,δCe与δEu、δCe与(La/Sm)N均没有相关性(图4a,b),证明成岩作用对稀土元素的分布影响不明显。海底高温热液具有强烈的Eu正异常特征[33]。本文研究样品稀土元素分布特征显示,有10件样品呈Eu负异常、8件样品呈正异常特征,与海底高温热液强烈Eu正异常特征存在显著差异,据此判断研究样品中的稀土元素的物源并非热液成因来源。海水的稀土元素分布特征一般为显著的负Ce异常、HREE富集、高Y/Ho比值和正La异常[34]。而研究泥页岩样品的稀土元素分布表现为LREE富集、正Ce异常、较低Y/Ho比值、正La异常,与海水稀土元素分布特征明显不同,据此判断研究样品中的稀土元素的物源并非海水及海洋生物体来源。

    Figure 4.  Correlations between main rare earth elements in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

    采用北美页岩[35]对临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的稀土元素数据进行标准化,研究样品的各稀土元素配分曲线趋势大致相同(图5),具体表现为LREE富集、HREE相对亏损;轻、重稀土元素之间分异程度较高;δEu分布在0.62~1.11之间,平均值为0.90,表现为Eu负异常。上述特征反应了研究样品的稀土元素具有一致的物源[36]。样品的配分曲线量值不同,指示该区物源相对稳定。采用La-(Th-HF)图(图6),分析临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的物源,认为主要来自上地壳的富长英质岩石。La/Yb-ΣREE图解可以用来判断源岩的属性[37]。如图7所示,太原组下段煤系泥页岩样品点主要落在花岗岩物源区。结合研究区晚古生代岩相古地理分布特征,认为来自北部阴山古陆的区域基底岩系是研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的主要物质来源[3848]。阴山古陆的区域基底变质岩系主要是钾长花岗岩等[30,49]。阴山古陆的基底岩系岩样中镓元素分布范围为13.6~22.0 μg/g,平均值为18.05 μg/g,大于上地壳镓含量平均值(17.5 μg/g),含有较高镓元素[49]。因此,镓含量较高的阴山古陆基底岩系为研究区太原组下段的镓富集提供了物质基础。

    Figure 5.  Rare earth element distribution in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

    Figure 6.  Distribution of La content and Th⁃Hf value in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

    Figure 7.  La/Yb⁃ΣREE diagram of coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

  • 稀土元素和微量元素中有一些元素具有很强的稳定性,如La、Th、Sc、Zr等,在后期的地质过程中不易迁移。我们可以将这些元素作为参数,分析和判断沉积区的构造背景。采用La⁃Th⁃Sc、Th⁃Sc⁃Zr/10及Th⁃Co⁃Zr/10图版[50],分析研究区构造背景,结果如图8所示。样品点大部分都落在图8图版中的大陆岛弧区域,表明研究区太原组物源区构造背景为大陆岛弧。大陆岛弧主导中古生代以来的全球化学风化作用[51],物源区为大陆岛弧的沉积构造背景有利于风化作用、剥蚀作用持续进行,进而利于物源区源岩遭受风化、剥蚀作用并释放出更多镓元素,促进镓元素的富集。

    Figure 8.  Tectonic background ternary diagrams for coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

  • 铀元素性质活跃,在风化过程中容易被氧化和淋滤迁移;钍元素作为惰性元素,迁移能力较弱,通常吸附富集在泥页岩中,在氧化环境中含量较高[52]。风化过程中,U、Th的地球化学性质差异造成二者发生分离,Th/U值发生变化,因此常用Th/U值来表征源区的风化程度[5354]。大陆地壳的Th/U值平均为3.80[55]。研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩样品Th/U值大于3.80的有17件,只有1件样品值为2.96;δU值介于0.68~1的有17件,大于1的有1件(表2)。以上数据表明,源区的岩石总体受到的风化程度高,大气淡水淋滤作用能促使物源区的花岗岩等岩石中的稀土元素发生富集和分异,因此淋滤作用是沉积区镓元素富集的控制性因素之一[56],总体上能促进镓的富集。

    此外,利用化学蚀变指数(CIA, chemical index of alteration)可以判断物源区的风化程度[57]。高CIA值反映温暖、潮湿气候下相对较强的风化程度,而低CIA值则反映寒冷、干燥气候下相对较弱的风化程度,具体可划分为弱的风化程度(CIA=50~60)、中等风化程度(CIA=60~80)、强烈风化程度(CIA=80~100)[5859]。本研究样品CIA值分布范围为77~92,平均值为83,属于强烈风化程度。强烈的风化作用,极其有利于物源区源岩遭受充分风化剥蚀而释放大量的镓元素。

  • 研究样品中硫含量明显分为高、低两段,并且低硫(含量小于0.41 μg/g)的占主导。临兴地区太原组下段属于陆表海环境下的潮汐三角洲相-障壁海岸相沉积体系[24],研究样品高硫、低硫含量的变化,反映了研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩的物源以陆源输入为主导,并具有间歇海侵的特点。此外,根据CaO/(MgO×Al2O3)对气候变化的指示(值越大,代表的气温就相对越高),计算获得研究样品的CaO/(MgO×Al2O3)值为0.01~0.07,平均0.04,说明太原组下段沉积期的环境以温暖湿润的气候为主,为长石碎屑的风化提供了适宜气候条件。前人研究认为,喜干型元素(Sr)与喜湿型元素(Cu)的比值对古气候的变化有灵敏的指示作用[6063],Sr/Cu<10指示温湿气候,Sr/Cu>10指示干热气候[62]。根据研究区18件煤系泥页岩样品中Sr/Cu值分布特征(图9),结合前人成果[17],认为在太原组下段沉积期,研究区以温暖湿润的气候为主,间歇性出现干热气候。

    Figure 9.  CaO/(MgO+Al2O3)⁃Sr/Cu values in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

  • V、Ni、Cr、Co等微量元素以胶体和黏土吸附的形式存在。当环境氧化—还原条件改变时,元素存在状态发生改变。因此V/Cr及Ni/Co比值可指示沉积水体的氧化还原环境。前人研究表明:还原环境中V/Cr值大于4.25,Ni/Co值大于7;弱氧化—弱还原环境中,V/Cr值介于2.00~4.25,Ni/Co值介于5~7;氧化环境下,V/Cr值小于2.00,Ni/Co值小于5[6468]。通过对18件样品的微量元素结果进行分析,发现研究样品的V/Cr值介于1.46~2.44,平均值为1.87;Ni/Co值介于1.25~6.43,平均值为2.61。若是按上述参数指标,指示研究样品的形成沉积环境为氧化—弱还原弱氧化环境,但是该解释与地质现实情况不符。

    现实中,研究泥页岩样品均为暗色(灰黑色、黑色),TOC含量平均值高达2.32%,属于较高丰度的有机质,而有机质在还原环境才能被良好保存。同时,临兴地区太原组下段泥页岩中还富含指示还原性环境的黄铁矿[29]。师晶等[17]发现V/Cr、Ni/Co等对临兴地区上古生界沉积水体的氧化还原环境指示性较差,与地质现实不符合。因此可通过泥页岩呈暗色的颜色特征、有机质含量较高、富含指示还原性环境的黄铁矿等多个特征进行综合判断,认为研究区太原组下段的水体环境为还原性环境。

  • Li、Sr的元素含量对水体盐度的变化均有较好的指示作用。Li 含量大于150 μg/g,Sr含量介于800~1 000 μg/g,指示盐水(海相)沉积环境;Li含量小于90 μg/g,Sr含量介于100~500 μg/g,指示淡水(陆相)沉积环境[69]。此外,Sr/Ba值也常用做沉积物沉积时水体盐度的判定参数[7073]。在淡水环境下,Sr和Ba不易发生沉淀,Sr的溶解度更大,因此Sr/Ba值很低;随着盐度的增加,Ba的结晶先析,Sr/Ba值有所升高;盐度继续增大,Ba由于持续沉淀,导致其含量逐渐降低,Sr此时开始沉淀,沉积物中Sr/Ba值会发生明显的急剧增大的趋势。一般认为,Sr/Ba比值大于1.0为海相咸水,小于0.6为陆相淡水,介于0.6~1.0为半咸水相[74]。对研究区18件岩石样品Li和Sr/Ba比值进行统计分析(图10),数据显示研究区太原组下段沉积期的水体环境主体为淡水—半咸水过渡环境,局部为咸水环境,这与研究区太原组下段沉积环境属于陆表海环境下的潮汐三角洲—障壁海岸过渡相沉积体系的地质背景相符。

    Figure 10.  Li content vs. Sr/Ba ratio in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

  • 在沉积成岩期,煤系泥页岩中的有机质在热演化过程中释放大量有机酸,这些有机酸会对煤系泥页岩中的长石碎屑有显著的溶蚀分解作用。而煤系泥页岩中,碱性长石碎屑组分在遭受有机酸的溶蚀分解后,形成高岭石等矿物和SiO2胶体。形成的SiO2胶体被地下流体带走离开泥页岩体系,而高岭石等矿物残留在泥页岩体系中。镓元素是以类质同象取代铝的形式赋存于高岭石(高岭石为含铝的硅酸盐矿物)中,溶蚀作用过程中镓元素并没有流失。溶蚀作用形成的SiO2胶体被带走后,泥页岩总质量减小。镓元素含量/泥页岩总质量的比值就会增大,单位质量泥页岩中的镓元素含量增高,也就是镓元素在泥页岩中发生了富集作用(也称二次富集作用)。研究样品中的镓元素含量与SiO2含量呈现弱负相关性(图11),也在一定程度上证明太原组下段煤系泥页岩中的镓元素在成岩期存在比较有限的二次富集作用。然而,研究区太原组下段煤系中泥砂薄层高频叠置的沉积特点,使得煤系岩层的成岩环境开放性差,SiO2和K2O等成分不能及时迁移走,溶蚀不能持续有效进行,阻碍了镓元素在这一阶段大规模地富集于高岭石和勃姆石等矿物中。由此认为研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中的镓元素在成岩期发生了一定程度的富集,但富集作用有限。

    Figure 11.  Ga vs. SiO2 correlation in coal⁃measure shale, lower Taiyuan Formation, Linxing area

  • 中奥陶世,华北大陆整体隆升。在奥陶纪植物繁茂、气候温湿的环境下,阴山造山带花岗岩系遭受持续稳定的剥蚀[3848]。长期缓慢的隆升和温暖湿润的气候为镓元素的富集提供了长期稳定的物质供给。长英质的岩石经物理、化学和生物风化作用,形成细碎屑、溶解物质和黏土矿物。富含镓的碱性长石在风化过程中释放镓,同时形成黏土矿物、SiO2胶体和长石细碎屑。镓元素是典型的亲氧元素,长石解离出的镓容易形成不溶于水的含氧盐与氧化物,和黏土矿物一起参与到沉积作用中,形成含镓的高岭石和勃姆石等矿物。温暖湿润为主、间歇性干热的气候特征,有利于长石在搬运和沉积过程中的持续风化;陆表海环境下的潮汐三角洲—障壁海岸过渡相环境下,沉积条件变化频繁,是镓元素在多阶段搬运沉积过程中不断富集的重要条件。

    煤系富含有机质,在沉积成岩期,有机质热演化释放大量有机酸。含镓元素的碱性长石碎屑在有机酸作用下发生溶蚀分解作用,产生SiO2胶体和高岭石。镓元素在这一阶段形成二次富集。镓元素在成岩阶段的富集程度取决于溶蚀作用的强度。由于煤系泥沙薄层叠置的特点,成岩环境开放性差,溶蚀不能长期持续进行,因此镓元素在这一阶段的富集作用要显著小于在风化搬运时期的富集作用。

    紫金山岩体的侵位导致岩体周边的煤系围岩局部温度升高。镓元素的熔点较低,镓元素在温度作用下向低温区迁移,形成了越靠近紫金山岩体镓元素含量越低的分布特征。

  • (1) 临兴地区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中镓含量为20.55~30.35 μg/g,平均值为24.7 μg/g,是典型的镓富集泥页岩。泥页岩中镓含量在研究区紫金山岩体以北的研究区,随着靠近紫金山岩体,镓含量具有由北向南逐渐降低的趋势。在研究区紫金山岩体西南部,同样存在随着靠近紫金山岩体而镓含量逐渐降低的趋势。

    (2) 研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中,镓元素主要以类质同象取代铝的形式赋存于高岭石中,另有一定数量的镓元素赋存在碱性长石碎屑中。

    (3) 阴山造山带花岗岩系是研究区太原组下段煤系富镓泥页岩的主要物源,加里东期华北克拉通长期缓慢稳定隆升,为源岩风化形成富镓物源提供了有利的构造环境。风化和沉积条件是研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中镓富集的控制性因素。具体为温暖湿润、间歇性干热的气候,淡水为主、缺氧还原的沉积环境。

    (4) 成岩期,煤系有机质热演化释放大量有机酸,导致碱性长石碎屑溶蚀而释放出镓,镓元素进一步富集于黏土矿物中。由于煤系成岩体系开放性差,镓的成岩富集作用有限。

    (5) 研究区太原组下段煤系泥页岩中镓的富集过程以陆源富集型为主,成岩改造对镓的富集起一定作用。紫金山岩体的侵位使得岩体周边煤系围岩形成局部高温环境。低熔点的镓元素在温度作用下发生迁移,导致靠近紫金山岩体的煤系泥页岩中的镓元素含量降低。

Reference (74)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return