Advanced Search

BAO JianPing, SI ChunSong, JIANG XingChao, ZHANG RunHe, ZHU CuiShan, HUANG Ling, MA LiQiao, WANG PengWan. The Bimodal Distributions of n-alkanes in the Post-mature Marine Source Rocks and Solid Bitumen from the Northern Guizhou Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(1): 181-190. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.01.017
Citation: PAN Xing, WANG HaiHong, WANG ZhenLiang, LIU YiCang, GAO XuHui, WANG LianGuo, XIAO ShengDong. Differential Diagenesis of Delta Plain Sandstone and Its Control on Reservoir Classification: A case study on Yan'an Formation in Yinjiacheng area,southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 1031-1043. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.182

Differential Diagenesis of Delta Plain Sandstone and Its Control on Reservoir Classification: A case study on Yan'an Formation in Yinjiacheng area,southwestern Ordos Basin

doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.182
Funds:  National Science and Technology Major Project, No. 2017ZX05008-004-004; Project of the 11th Oil Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield, PetroChina, No.2017-13853
  • Received Date: 2018-05-11
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-11-19
  • Publish Date: 2019-10-10
  • Diagenesis directly affects the pore evolution of reservoirs and controls the physical properties and oil content of reservoirs. It is of great significance to clarify the differential diagenesis of reservoirs and the sequence of hydrocarbon charging. Several techniques were used to study the sandstone reservoir rocks of the delta plain subfacies in the Yan' an Fm (J1y) in the Yinjiacheng-Hedao area:observation of cores and thin-section optical microscopy, XRD, fluorescence, physical properties, mercury injection, and other testing methods. The study has shown that the differences in the original sedimentary features and diagenetic fluids are the main reasons for the differences in reservoir diagenesis. There is good correspondence between diagenetic facies, reservoir types and oil production.Medium-tocoarse-grained sandstones in distributary channel sedimentary microfacies have large initial porosity, strong acid dissolution, well-developed grain mold pores and throats, and good pore-throat connectivity. The porosity range is 11%18% and the permeability range is (20-1 000)×10-3 μm2. Displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.02 MPa and 0.1 MPa, and the median pressure ranges from 0.04 MPa to 1.3 MPa. The median radius range is 16-27.1 μm. This develops large pores and throats and results in medium-porosity and medium-to-high permeability reservoirs. This type of reservoir rock has undergone phases 1, 2 and 3 hydrocarbon charging, which produces industrial-grade oil flow and is classified as a Type I reservoir.The diagenetic evolution of medium-to-fine sandstone in distributary channel sedimentary microfacies is relatively slow and homogeneous. Acid dissolution produces a large number of dispersed dissolution pores but the connectivity is poor and therefore its permeability is low. This is its main difference from a Type I reservoir with similar porosity. The porosity range is 11%-17% and the permeability range is (3-60)×10-3 μm2. The displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.03 MPa and 0.41 MPa, and the median pressure ranges from 0.1 MPa to 2.0 MPa. The median radius is 0.8-7.2 μm. Small-to-mesopores and throats are developed, forming medium-porosity and medium to low permeability reservoirs. This type of reservoir rock has undergone phases 1, 2 and 3 hydrocarbon charging, and has low oil flow. It is classified as a Type Ⅱ reservoir.Pelitic fine siltstone in natural levee sedimentary microfacies is strongly compacted, which is the main cause of the small pore size. It is characterized by the bending deformation of mica. This type of reservoir has a porosity from 5% to 13% and a permeability from (0.05-3)×10-3 μm2. The displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.4 MPa and 0.9 MPa; median pressure ranges from 2 MPa to 5 MPa. The median radius ranges from 0.4 μm to 1.3 μm. Such reservoirs are low-porosity and extra-low-permeability reservoirs, or ‘tight’ reservoirs. Depending to the calcite content, this kind of reservoir may be further divided into two types. One kind has no obvious calcite cementation, and because it develops extra-small pore throats, it is regarded as a low-porosity and extra-low-permeability reservoir. This kind of reservoir has undergone stages 1 and 2 hydrocarbon charging, which has high water production. The other kind has developed both strong compaction and a large amount of calcite cementation. This kind has no hydrocarbon display, and is regarded as a ‘dense’ or ‘invalid’ reservoir. This kind of reservoir is a ‘dry layer’. Both of these are classified as Type Ⅲ reservoirs.Strong relationships were found between the spatial distribution of the different reservoir rock types and the oil yields of individual wells, so it is suggested that this study provides theoretical support for the prediction of further productive reservoirs.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401234
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 4.1 %FULLTEXT: 4.1 %META: 84.1 %META: 84.1 %PDF: 11.8 %PDF: 11.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.1 %其他: 3.1 %其他: 1.4 %其他: 1.4 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %United Kingdom: 0.2 %United Kingdom: 0.2 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %中卫: 0.8 %中卫: 0.8 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %兰州: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %凉山: 0.2 %凉山: 0.2 %北京: 9.1 %北京: 9.1 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %和田: 0.2 %和田: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %城南: 0.2 %城南: 0.2 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %天津: 1.0 %天津: 1.0 %巴音郭楞: 0.4 %巴音郭楞: 0.4 %广安: 0.4 %广安: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 4.3 %张家口: 4.3 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 1.4 %武汉: 1.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %焦作: 0.2 %焦作: 0.2 %牡丹江: 0.2 %牡丹江: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 11.2 %芒廷维尤: 11.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %西宁: 39.1 %西宁: 39.1 %西安: 2.7 %西安: 2.7 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赤峰: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.2 %运城: 3.3 %运城: 3.3 %通化: 0.2 %通化: 0.2 %遂宁: 0.2 %遂宁: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 2.3 %郑州: 2.3 %酒泉: 0.2 %酒泉: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.8 %长治: 0.8 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %首尔: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaUnited KingdomUnited States[]上海中卫临汾丹东克拉玛依兰州凉山北京南京南昌台州合肥呼和浩特和田哈尔滨哥伦布唐山城南大庆天津巴音郭楞广安广州张家口成都昆明杭州武汉济南济宁深圳温州湖州湛江漯河焦作牡丹江福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贵阳赤峰运城通化遂宁邯郸郑州酒泉重庆金华长沙长治青岛首尔马鞍山
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 肖胜东,王震亮,潘星,王联国,朱立文,刘一婷. 演武地区延8段储层微观孔隙结构特征及成因. 断块油气田. 2024(01): 86-95+105 .
    2. 郭梦炎,张创,王凤琴,薛刚,汪立. 永宁油田侏罗系延8差薄油层成因分析与测井识别. 河北地质大学学报. 2024(03): 38-43 .
    3. 张世铭,张小军,张婷静,朱军,郑永仙,易定红,霍鹏,伏珏蓉. 细粒碎屑岩储层基本特征及控制因素分析——以柴西茫崖地区新生代为例. 沉积学报. 2023(02): 633-645 . 本站查看
    4. 杨尚锋,鲍志东,沈延伟,高银山,林艳波,朱立华,陈小宏,丁圣,朱博华,齐晴,李飞. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区侏罗系延安组古河道砂岩储集层成岩演化及主要胶结物来源. 古地理学报. 2023(04): 906-919 .
    5. 单云鹏,王红军,张良杰,白振华,苏朋辉,赫英旭,孟维康,刘航宇,程木伟. 三角图的原理、快速绘制以及在砂岩分类中的应用. 沉积学报. 2022(04): 1095-1108 . 本站查看
    6. 李德华. 海安凹陷古近系阜三段储层特征研究. 化工设计通讯. 2020(04): 244-245 .
    7. 何星辰,范巍. 彭阳地区侏罗系延安组地层精细对比与划分. 国外测井技术. 2020(02): 37-39 .
    8. 李丹,林承焰,董春梅,杨玲,朱兆群,马存飞,毛毳,张涛. 源下致密砂岩储层垂向成岩非均一性成因机制. 中国矿业大学学报. 2020(04): 693-707 .

    Other cited types(7)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(431) PDF downloads(83) Cited by(15)

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  2018-05-11
  • Revised:  2018-11-19
  • Published:  2019-10-10

Differential Diagenesis of Delta Plain Sandstone and Its Control on Reservoir Classification: A case study on Yan'an Formation in Yinjiacheng area,southwestern Ordos Basin

doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.182
Funds:  National Science and Technology Major Project, No. 2017ZX05008-004-004; Project of the 11th Oil Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield, PetroChina, No.2017-13853

Abstract: Diagenesis directly affects the pore evolution of reservoirs and controls the physical properties and oil content of reservoirs. It is of great significance to clarify the differential diagenesis of reservoirs and the sequence of hydrocarbon charging. Several techniques were used to study the sandstone reservoir rocks of the delta plain subfacies in the Yan' an Fm (J1y) in the Yinjiacheng-Hedao area:observation of cores and thin-section optical microscopy, XRD, fluorescence, physical properties, mercury injection, and other testing methods. The study has shown that the differences in the original sedimentary features and diagenetic fluids are the main reasons for the differences in reservoir diagenesis. There is good correspondence between diagenetic facies, reservoir types and oil production.Medium-tocoarse-grained sandstones in distributary channel sedimentary microfacies have large initial porosity, strong acid dissolution, well-developed grain mold pores and throats, and good pore-throat connectivity. The porosity range is 11%18% and the permeability range is (20-1 000)×10-3 μm2. Displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.02 MPa and 0.1 MPa, and the median pressure ranges from 0.04 MPa to 1.3 MPa. The median radius range is 16-27.1 μm. This develops large pores and throats and results in medium-porosity and medium-to-high permeability reservoirs. This type of reservoir rock has undergone phases 1, 2 and 3 hydrocarbon charging, which produces industrial-grade oil flow and is classified as a Type I reservoir.The diagenetic evolution of medium-to-fine sandstone in distributary channel sedimentary microfacies is relatively slow and homogeneous. Acid dissolution produces a large number of dispersed dissolution pores but the connectivity is poor and therefore its permeability is low. This is its main difference from a Type I reservoir with similar porosity. The porosity range is 11%-17% and the permeability range is (3-60)×10-3 μm2. The displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.03 MPa and 0.41 MPa, and the median pressure ranges from 0.1 MPa to 2.0 MPa. The median radius is 0.8-7.2 μm. Small-to-mesopores and throats are developed, forming medium-porosity and medium to low permeability reservoirs. This type of reservoir rock has undergone phases 1, 2 and 3 hydrocarbon charging, and has low oil flow. It is classified as a Type Ⅱ reservoir.Pelitic fine siltstone in natural levee sedimentary microfacies is strongly compacted, which is the main cause of the small pore size. It is characterized by the bending deformation of mica. This type of reservoir has a porosity from 5% to 13% and a permeability from (0.05-3)×10-3 μm2. The displacement pressure fluctuates between 0.4 MPa and 0.9 MPa; median pressure ranges from 2 MPa to 5 MPa. The median radius ranges from 0.4 μm to 1.3 μm. Such reservoirs are low-porosity and extra-low-permeability reservoirs, or ‘tight’ reservoirs. Depending to the calcite content, this kind of reservoir may be further divided into two types. One kind has no obvious calcite cementation, and because it develops extra-small pore throats, it is regarded as a low-porosity and extra-low-permeability reservoir. This kind of reservoir has undergone stages 1 and 2 hydrocarbon charging, which has high water production. The other kind has developed both strong compaction and a large amount of calcite cementation. This kind has no hydrocarbon display, and is regarded as a ‘dense’ or ‘invalid’ reservoir. This kind of reservoir is a ‘dry layer’. Both of these are classified as Type Ⅲ reservoirs.Strong relationships were found between the spatial distribution of the different reservoir rock types and the oil yields of individual wells, so it is suggested that this study provides theoretical support for the prediction of further productive reservoirs.

BAO JianPing, SI ChunSong, JIANG XingChao, ZHANG RunHe, ZHU CuiShan, HUANG Ling, MA LiQiao, WANG PengWan. The Bimodal Distributions of n-alkanes in the Post-mature Marine Source Rocks and Solid Bitumen from the Northern Guizhou Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(1): 181-190. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.01.017
Citation: PAN Xing, WANG HaiHong, WANG ZhenLiang, LIU YiCang, GAO XuHui, WANG LianGuo, XIAO ShengDong. Differential Diagenesis of Delta Plain Sandstone and Its Control on Reservoir Classification: A case study on Yan'an Formation in Yinjiacheng area,southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 1031-1043. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.182

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return