Advanced Search

DENG Kai, YANG ShouYe, WANG ZhongBo, LI Chao, BI Lei, Yuan-pin CHANG, James T.LIU. Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(3): 531-542. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011
Citation: DENG Kai, YANG ShouYe, WANG ZhongBo, LI Chao, BI Lei, Yuan-pin CHANG, James T.LIU. Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(3): 531-542. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011

Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance

doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41376049, 41225020; National Program on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction(No. GASI-GEOGE-03)
  • Received Date: 2015-10-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-12-24
  • Publish Date: 2016-06-10
  • A total of 384 Mt/yr of suspended sediment is supplied to ocean by small mountainous rivers in Taiwan (1970—1999), equivalent to the sum of sediment discharge from three major rivers (the Yangtze River, the Yellow River and the Pearl River) in China. Hence, it has an appreciable impact on the sedimentary process of the epicontinental shelf. There are altogether 151 rivers in Taiwan, most of which originate from the Central Range. For our study river basins, the Zhuoshui River and the Lanyang River feed into the Taiwan Strait and the Pacific Ocean, respectively. The Zhuoshui River flows through the western Central Range, the Hsuehshan Range, the Western Foothills and the Coastal Plain in turn. And sequences of the Hsuehshan Range and the western Central Range outcrop in the Lanyang River basin. Heavy mineral types and contents of eight sediment samples from the Zhuoshui River (ZS1~ZS5) and the Lanyang River (LY1~LY3) are analyzed in whole size fraction. Twenty kinds of heavy minerals are identified. The weight percentage of heavy minerals varies from 0.039% to 0.116% in the Zhuoshui River, and from 0.004% to 0.040% in the Lanyang River. On the whole, the weight percentage declines from upstream to downstream.
    There is an irregular spatial distribution of heavy mineral assemblages along both rivers. For the Zhuoshui River, the dominated heavy mineral assemblage is pyrite-limonite-magnetite in the upper reaches, zircon-limonite-magnetite-pyrite in the middle reaches, zircon-garnet-limonite-ilmenite-anatase-leucoxene in the lower reaches. For the Lanyang River, the dominated heavy mineral assemblage is zircon-epidote-pyrite in the upper reaches, zircon-magnesite-limonite-leucoxene in the middle reaches, zircon-magnesite-limonite-anatase-pyrite in the lower reaches. Variations of heavy mineral types and contents along the two rivers indicate that most sediments are mainly supplied by proximal source rocks, and signatures of heavy minerals from upstream are masked. Also, there exists difference in contributions to sediments between potential provenances: heavy minerals in the lower reaches of both rivers are mostly derived from Quaternary sediments, and in the upper reaches mainly supplied by Lushan Formation of the Central Range. In addition, because the distribution of heavy mineral assemblages is primarily controlled by source rocks, some heavy mineral indexes (ATi, GZi and ZTR) cannot be used properly in these small mountainous rivers.
    The differences in bedrocks between mainland and Taiwan make the heavy mineral assemblages different between both sides of the strait. The typical heavy minerals in the rivers of Chinese mainland, like magnetite and epidote, are not common in the Taiwanese Rivers. However, the enrichment of zircon, magnesite and pyrite in the mouth of the Lanyang River, and the enrichment of zircon and garnet in the mouth of the Zhuoshui River, are there respective characteristics. All these features may offer some reference value for tracing the provenances of sediments in the epicontinental shelf.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.511.522.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 5.5 %FULLTEXT: 5.5 %META: 74.5 %META: 74.5 %PDF: 20.1 %PDF: 20.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.9 %其他: 4.9 %其他: 2.4 %其他: 2.4 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %Russian Federation: 0.3 %Russian Federation: 0.3 %Taoyuan District: 0.3 %Taoyuan District: 0.3 %United States: 1.8 %United States: 1.8 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 5.2 %上海: 5.2 %中卫: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %凉山: 0.3 %凉山: 0.3 %北京: 7.6 %北京: 7.6 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %厦门: 1.8 %厦门: 1.8 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %和田: 0.3 %和田: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %张家口: 2.1 %张家口: 2.1 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %武汉: 2.4 %武汉: 2.4 %汕头: 0.3 %汕头: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %深圳: 2.7 %深圳: 2.7 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %牡丹江: 0.3 %牡丹江: 0.3 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %纳什维尔: 0.3 %纳什维尔: 0.3 %美国弗吉尼亚: 0.3 %美国弗吉尼亚: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 16.1 %芒廷维尤: 16.1 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %西宁: 29.5 %西宁: 29.5 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %遂宁: 0.3 %遂宁: 0.3 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %青岛: 2.1 %青岛: 2.1 %香港: 0.9 %香港: 0.9 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaRussian FederationTaoyuan DistrictUnited States[]上海中卫兰州凉山北京南京南昌南通厦门台州合肥和田哈尔滨哥伦布大庆天津广州张家口成都昆明武汉汕头济南深圳温州湖州湛江漯河牡丹江福州纳什维尔美国弗吉尼亚芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁西安西雅图运城遂宁郑州长沙青岛香港
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 饶文波,洪申申,栗天宁,茅昌平. 江苏沿海沙脊群表层沉积物Pb同位素特征及对物源的指示. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 84-91 .
    2. 王庆同,王海根,燕同祥,毛方松,陈梁,王孟瑶. 莱州湾南岸入海河流重矿物特征及其物源意义. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2024(06): 130-139 .
    3. 苗清. 西湖凹陷中央反转构造带中南部花港组母质条件分析. 中国石油和化工标准与质量. 2023(11): 91-93+96 .
    4. 于健,金秉福,王孟瑶,王昕. 短源河流碎屑矿物在河道、河口和海滩的组分变化及其控制因素——以山东半岛辛安河为例. 海洋学报. 2023(07): 168-182 .
    5. 张晓,朱丽东,李凤全,马桢桢,熊文婷,贾佳,王琳怡. 0.44 Ma以来南方风尘加积型红土物源分析:重矿物和碎屑锆石年代学证据. 沉积学报. 2022(02): 494-507 . 本站查看
    6. 杨丹丹,刘盛,张志顺,赵彦彦,杨俊,魏浩天,张广璐,孙国静,郭晓强. 南海北部神狐海域不同粒级沉积物的地球化学特征及其物源指示意义. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(10): 109-126 .
    7. 邹亮,窦衍光,陈晓辉,胡邦琦,林曦. 冲绳海槽中南部不同环境表层沉积物质来源. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2021(01): 115-124 .
    8. 李安春,张凯棣. 东海内陆架泥质沉积体研究进展. 海洋与湖沼. 2020(04): 705-727 .
    9. 宁泽,韩宗珠,林学辉,张勇,毕世普,孔祥淮,刘金庆. 山东半岛南部近岸海域碎屑矿物对中小河流的物源响应. 海洋地质前沿. 2019(04): 57-68 .
    10. 刘健辉,姜锋,陈杰,孙千里,陈静,陈中原. 中国典型河流沉积物石英释光性质初探及其物源指示意义. 高校地质学报. 2018(01): 88-96 .
    11. 邓凯,杨守业,黄湘通,徐娟. 山溪性河流锆石年代学对比及对东部海区物源示踪意义. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2018(01): 178-186 .
    12. MA Xiaohong,HAN Zongzhu,ZHANG Yong,BI Shipu,HU Gang,LIU Jinqing,XU Chengfen. Heavy Minerals in Shelf Sediments off Fujian-Zhejiang Coast of the East China Sea: Their Provenance and Geological Application. Journal of Ocean University of China. 2018(06): 1369-1381 .
    13. 王越奇,宋金明,袁华茂,李学刚,李宁,段丽琴. 西北太平洋黑潮源区沉积特征及黑潮输入对东海沉积物的影响. 海洋科学. 2018(09): 112-126 .

    Other cited types(14)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(597) PDF downloads(935) Cited by(27)

Proportional views
Related
Publishing history
  • Received:  2015-10-12
  • Revised:  2015-12-24
  • Published:  2016-06-10

Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance

doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41376049, 41225020; National Program on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction(No. GASI-GEOGE-03)

Abstract: A total of 384 Mt/yr of suspended sediment is supplied to ocean by small mountainous rivers in Taiwan (1970—1999), equivalent to the sum of sediment discharge from three major rivers (the Yangtze River, the Yellow River and the Pearl River) in China. Hence, it has an appreciable impact on the sedimentary process of the epicontinental shelf. There are altogether 151 rivers in Taiwan, most of which originate from the Central Range. For our study river basins, the Zhuoshui River and the Lanyang River feed into the Taiwan Strait and the Pacific Ocean, respectively. The Zhuoshui River flows through the western Central Range, the Hsuehshan Range, the Western Foothills and the Coastal Plain in turn. And sequences of the Hsuehshan Range and the western Central Range outcrop in the Lanyang River basin. Heavy mineral types and contents of eight sediment samples from the Zhuoshui River (ZS1~ZS5) and the Lanyang River (LY1~LY3) are analyzed in whole size fraction. Twenty kinds of heavy minerals are identified. The weight percentage of heavy minerals varies from 0.039% to 0.116% in the Zhuoshui River, and from 0.004% to 0.040% in the Lanyang River. On the whole, the weight percentage declines from upstream to downstream.
There is an irregular spatial distribution of heavy mineral assemblages along both rivers. For the Zhuoshui River, the dominated heavy mineral assemblage is pyrite-limonite-magnetite in the upper reaches, zircon-limonite-magnetite-pyrite in the middle reaches, zircon-garnet-limonite-ilmenite-anatase-leucoxene in the lower reaches. For the Lanyang River, the dominated heavy mineral assemblage is zircon-epidote-pyrite in the upper reaches, zircon-magnesite-limonite-leucoxene in the middle reaches, zircon-magnesite-limonite-anatase-pyrite in the lower reaches. Variations of heavy mineral types and contents along the two rivers indicate that most sediments are mainly supplied by proximal source rocks, and signatures of heavy minerals from upstream are masked. Also, there exists difference in contributions to sediments between potential provenances: heavy minerals in the lower reaches of both rivers are mostly derived from Quaternary sediments, and in the upper reaches mainly supplied by Lushan Formation of the Central Range. In addition, because the distribution of heavy mineral assemblages is primarily controlled by source rocks, some heavy mineral indexes (ATi, GZi and ZTR) cannot be used properly in these small mountainous rivers.
The differences in bedrocks between mainland and Taiwan make the heavy mineral assemblages different between both sides of the strait. The typical heavy minerals in the rivers of Chinese mainland, like magnetite and epidote, are not common in the Taiwanese Rivers. However, the enrichment of zircon, magnesite and pyrite in the mouth of the Lanyang River, and the enrichment of zircon and garnet in the mouth of the Zhuoshui River, are there respective characteristics. All these features may offer some reference value for tracing the provenances of sediments in the epicontinental shelf.

DENG Kai, YANG ShouYe, WANG ZhongBo, LI Chao, BI Lei, Yuan-pin CHANG, James T.LIU. Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(3): 531-542. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011
Citation: DENG Kai, YANG ShouYe, WANG ZhongBo, LI Chao, BI Lei, Yuan-pin CHANG, James T.LIU. Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in the River Sediments from Taiwan and Its Implications for Sediment Provenance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(3): 531-542. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.03.011

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return