高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素

张妮妮,  刘洛夫,  苏天喜,  戴琦雯,  赵园园

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 沉积学报  > 2015 >  33(1): 160-169
张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 戴琦雯, 赵园园. 库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
引用本文: 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 戴琦雯, 赵园园. 库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
shu
ZHANG NiNi, LIU LuoFu, SU TianXi, DAI QiWen, ZHAO YuanYuan. Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of the Lower Jurassic Tight Sandstone in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
Citation: ZHANG NiNi, LIU LuoFu, SU TianXi, DAI QiWen, ZHAO YuanYuan. Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of the Lower Jurassic Tight Sandstone in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
shu

库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素

doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
  • 1.

    中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室 北京 102249;

  • 2.

    中国石油大学盆地与油藏研究中心 北京 102249

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目“鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组致密油含油边界识别研究”(批准号:41372143)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张妮妮 女 1988年出生 硕士研究生 沉积(岩石)学及储层地质学 E-mail: lanhudieznn@163.com

    通讯作者:

    刘洛夫 男 教授 E-mail: liulf@cup.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE122.2

Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of the Lower Jurassic Tight Sandstone in Eastern Kuqa Depression

  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249;

  • 2.

    Basin and Reservoir Research Center, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249

    摘要
  • 摘要: 塔里木盆地致密砂岩气分布广、勘探潜力大,是今后勘探的重要前瞻性领域.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统砂岩储层普遍致密,加强其储层特征及主控因素的研究,对指导下一步的天然气勘探开发具有重要意义.为了揭示了塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层的发育规律及主控因素,通过铸体薄片、阴极发光、扫描电镜、激光共聚焦等测试手段并结合测井资料,研究了储层的岩石学特征、孔隙结构特征和物性特征.结果表明,该区储层岩石类型以岩屑砂岩为主,岩石成分成熟度低,结构成熟度中等;孔隙结构主要为中孔细喉和小孔微喉,孔隙连通性较差;孔隙度大部分为4%~12%,平均为8.12%,有效空气渗透率主要为(0.1~3)×10-3μm2,属于典型的致密砂岩储层.在此基础上,综合分析了致密储层与沉积作用、成岩作用、构造作用的关系.研究认为,储层的物性受沉积作用、成岩作用、构造作用等的共同影响,其中主控因素是受沉积作用控制的粒度、成岩作用中的压实作用和构造压实作用.
    Abstract: The tight sandstone gas of Tarim Basin has a large distribution and great exploration potential, which is an important prospective exploration field of the basin in the future. The Lower Jurassic sandstone in eastern Kuqa depression is commonly tight. It is important for the further exploration and development to strengthen the study of its reservoir characteristics and the main controlling factors. In order to reveal the controlling factors and development mechanism of the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone reservoir in eastern Kuqa depression, by use of the tests of casting section, cathodeluminescence, scanning electron microscope and laser confocal microscopy are applied, together with the geological and logging analyses. The lithology, pore structure characteristics and physical properties are carried out in this paper. The results show that lithic sandstone is the main reservoir rock type, and the rock composition maturity is low while the textural maturity is of medium degree. The pore structure is mainly mesoporous with fine throat and micropore with fine throat. Majority of the porosity values ranges from 4% to 12%, with an average of 8.12%, and the effective air permeability is mainly (0.1~3)×10-3μm2; On the basis of the comprehensive analyses of sedimentation, diagenesis and tectonics of tight reservoir strata, the studies suggest that the reservoir physical property is mainly controlled by sedimentation, diagenesis and tectonism. The main controlling factors are granularity and compaction.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(28)
  • [1] Golab A N, Knackstedt M A, Averdunk H,et al. 3D porosity and mineralogy characterization in tight gas sandstones[J]. The Leading Edge, 2010, 29(12): 1476-1483.
    [2] Higgs K E, Zwingmann H, Reyes A G,et al. Diagenesis, porosity evolution, and petroleum emplacement in tight gas reservoirs, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77(12): 1003-1025.
    [3] Neves F A, Al-Marzoug A, Kim J J,et al. Fracture characterization of deep tight gas sands using azimuthal velocity and AVO seismic data in Saudi Arabia[J]. The Leading Edge, 2003, 22(5): 469-475.
    [4] Smith T, Sayers C M, Liner C. Introduction to this special section: Tight gas sands[J]. The Leading Edge, 2010, 29(12): 1463.
    [5] Grechka V, Mazumdar P, Shapiro S A. Predicting permeability and gas production of hydraulically fractured tight sands from microseismic data[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(1): B1-B10.
    [6] 张晓峰,侯明才,陈安清. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北部下石盒子组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(11):34-38.[Zhang Xiaofeng, Hou Mingcai, Chen Anqing. Features and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Lower Shihezi Formation in the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(11): 34-38.]
    [7] 张超,李旭平,钟建华,等. 吐哈盆地巴喀油田下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素分析[J]. 山东科技大学学报:自然科学版,2011,30(6):65-72.[Zhang Chao, Li Xuping, Zhong Jianhua,et al. Properties and the main controlling factors of compact sandstone reservoirs in Lower Jurassic series of Baka oilfield in Tuha Basin[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science, 2011, 30(6): 65-72.]
    [8] 康毅力,罗平亚. 中国致密砂岩气藏勘探开发关键工程技术现状与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2007,34(2):239-245.[Kang Yili, Luo Pingya. Current status and prospect of key techniques for exploration and production of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(2): 239-245.]
    [9] 李建忠,郭彬程,郑民,等. 中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学,2012,23(4):607-615.[Li Jianzhong, Guo Bincheng, Zheng Min, et al. Main type, geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4): 607-615.]
    [10] 童晓光,郭彬程,李建忠,等. 中美致密砂岩气成藏分布异同点比较研究与意义[J]. 中国工程科学,2012,14(6): 9-15.[Tong Xiaoguang, Guo Bincheng, Li Jianzhong, et al. Comparison study on accumulation & distribution of tight sandstone gas between China and the United States and its significance[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2012, 14(6): 9-15.]
    [11] 张国生,赵文智,杨涛,等. 我国致密砂岩气资源潜力、分布与未来发展地位[J]. 中国工程科学,2012,14(6):87-93.[Zhang Guosheng, Zhao Wenzhi, Yang Tao, et al. Resource evaluation,position and distribution of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2012, 14(6): 87-93.]
    [12] 何登发,周新源,杨海军,等. 库车坳陷的地质结构及其对大油气田的控制作用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2009,33(1):19-32.[He Dengfa, Zhou Xinyuan, Yang Haijun, et al. Geological structure and its controls on giant oil and gas fields in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin: A clue from new shot seismic data[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(1): 19-32.]
    [13] 贾进华,薛良清. 库车坳陷中生界陆相层序地层格架与盆地演化[J]. 地质科学,2002,37(增刊):121-128.[Jia Jinhua, Xue Liangqing. Pattern and evolution of Mesozoic continental sequence stratigraphy in the Kuqa depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2002, 37(Suppl.): 121-128.]
    [14] 卢双舫,赵孟军,付广,等. 塔里木盆地库车油气系统富气的主控因素分析[J]. 大庆石油学院学报,2001,25(3):10-13.[Lu Shuangfang, Zhao Mengjun, Fu Guan, et al. Key factor analysis of enriching in natural gas in Kuche petroleum system, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2001, 25(3): 10-13.]
    [15] 吕锡敏,皮学军,任战利,等. 库车前陆盆地含油气系统的地质特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2004,15(3):214-217.[Lü Ximin, Pi Xuejun, Ren Zhanli, et al. The geological characteristics of the petroleum system in Kucha Foreland Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2004, 15(3): 214-217.]
    [16] 杨申谷,邹华耀. 依南构造下侏罗统储层影响因素分析[J]. 河南石油,2004,18(4):4-6.[Yang Shengu, Zou Huayao. An analysis of influential factors on Lower Jurassic reservoirs in Yinan Structure[J]. Henan Petroleum, 2004, 18(4): 4-6.]
    [17] 孙先达,索丽敏,张民志,等. 激光共聚焦扫描显微检测技术在大庆探区储层分析研究中的新进展[J]. 岩石学报,2005,21(5):1479-1488.[Sun Xianda, Suo Limin, Zhang Minzhi,et al. New progress of reservoir research by the technology of laser confocal scanning microscope analysis in the Daqing exploration area[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 21(5): 1479-1488.]
    [18] 应凤祥,杨式升,张敏,等. 激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构[J]. 沉积学报,2002,20(1):75-79.[Ying Fengxiang, Yang Shisheng, Zhang Min, et al. Application of laser scanning confocal microscope to the measurement of pore texture in reservoirs[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(1): 75-79.]
    [19] 白玉彬,赵靖舟,方朝强,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长6油层组准连续型致密砂岩油藏形成机理[J]. 石油实验地质,2013,35(1):65-71.[Bai Yubin, Zhao Jingzhou, Fang Chaoqiang, et al. Forming mechanism of quasi-continuous tight sandstone reservoir of Chang 6 oil-bearing formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(1): 65-71.]
    [20] 赵靖舟,付金华,姚泾利,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型致密砂岩大气田成藏模式[J]. 石油学报,2012,33(增刊):37-52.[Zhao Jingzhou, Fu Jinhua, Yao Jingli,et al. Quasi-continuous accumulation model of large tight sandstone gas field in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(Suppl.): 37-52.]
    [21] Morad S, Al-Ramadan K, Ketzer J M, et al. The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs: A review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(8): 1267-1309.
    [22] 刘吉余,马志欣,孙淑艳. 致密含气砂岩研究现状及发展展望[J]. 天然气地球科学,2008,19(3):316-319.[Liu Jiyu, Ma Zhixin, Sun Shuyan. Present research situation and prospects of tight gas sands[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2008, 19(3): 316-319.]
    [23] 杨升宇,张金川,黄卫东,等. 吐哈盆地柯柯亚地区致密砂岩气储层“甜点”类型及成因[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(2):272-282.[Yang Shengyu, Zhang Jinchuan, Huang Weidong, et al. “Sweet spot” types of reservoirs and genesis of tight sandstone gas in Kekeya area, Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2): 272-282.]
    [24] 寿建峰,朱国华,张惠良. 构造侧向挤压与砂岩成岩压实作用——以塔里木盆地为例[J]. 沉积学报,2003,21(1): 90-95.[Shou Jianfeng, Zhu Guohua, Zhang Huiliang. Lateral structure compression and its influence on sandstone diagenesis—A case study from the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(1): 90-95.]
    [25] 杨威,魏国齐,李宇平,等. 库车前陆盆地下侏罗统成岩作用[J]. 天然气工业,2005,25(9):17-19.[Yang Wei, Wei Guoqi, Li Yupin,et al. Diageneses of lower Jurassic in Kuche Foreland Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(9): 17-19.]
    [26] 寿建峰,斯春松,朱国华,等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷下侏罗统砂岩储层性质的控制因素[J]. 地质论评,2001,47(3):272-277.[Shou Jianfeng, Si Chunsong, Zhu Guohua, et al. Controlling factors of the properties of the Lower Jurassic sandstone reservoirs in the Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2001, 47(3): 272-277.]
    [27] 杨帆,邸宏利,王少依,等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系储层特征及成因[J]. 古地理学报,2002,4(2):46-55.[Yang Fan, Di Hongli, Wang Shaoyi, et al. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of the Jurassic in Yiqikelike tectonic zone of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4(2): 46-55.]
    [28] 张荣虎,姚根顺,寿建峰,等. 沉积、成岩、构造一体化孔隙度预测模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2011,38(2):145-151.[Zhang Ronghu, Yao Genshun, Shou Jianfeng, et al. An integration porosity forecast model of deposition, diagenesis and structure[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2): 145-151.]
    • 相关文章
  • [1] 苏加亮, 林良彪, 余瑜, 王志康, 李晔寒.  川西新场地区上三叠统须家河组二、四段物源及储层特征差异对比研究 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(5): 1451-1467. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.142
    [2] 张响响, 陶士振, 朱如凯, 柳少波, 公言杰.  成岩作用对致密油储层分布的影响 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(2): 559-568. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.106
    [3] 客昆, 秦建华, 牟必鑫, 陈杨, 魏洪刚, 周家云, 龚大兴, 赖杨, 赵安坤, 刘治成, 客达.  西昌盆地白果湾组泥页岩储层特征及主控因素 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(2): 619-632. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.097
    [4] 蔡来星, 杨田, 田景春, 易娟子, 任启强.  致密砂岩储层中黏土矿物发育特征及其生长机理研究进展 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(6): 1859-1889. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2023.010
    [5] 于雯泉.  致密砂岩储层成因类型与致密化过程差异性 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(4): 1271-1280. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.158
    [6] 罗雨婷, 张敏.  松辽盆地梨树断陷原油高碳数三环萜烷分布特征及主控因素 . 沉积学报, 2023, 41(2): 569-583. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.071
    [7] 徐宁宁, 张守鹏, 王永诗, 邱隆伟.  鄂尔多斯盆地北部二叠系下石盒子组致密砂岩成岩作用及孔隙成因 . 沉积学报, 2022, 40(2): 422-434. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.027
    [8] 曹瑛倬, 鲍志东, 鲁锴, 徐世琦, 王贵玲, 袁淑琴, 季汉成.  冀中坳陷雄县地热田主控因素及成因模式 . 沉积学报, 2021, 39(4): 863-872. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.051
    [9] 刘明洁, 季永承, 唐青松, 唐大海, 梁锋, 车国琼, 王立恩, 李明, 谭秀成, 曾伟, 连承波.  成岩体系对致密砂岩储层质量的控制 . 沉积学报, 2021, 39(4): 826-840. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.62
    [10] 芦飞凡, 谭秀成, 王利超, 唐青松, 肖笛, 董少峰, 苏成鹏, 潘政屹.  川中地区中二叠统栖霞组滩控岩溶型白云岩储层特征及主控因素 . 沉积学报, 2021, 39(2): 456-469. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.020
    [11] 李继岩.  多期构造裂缝发育充填特征及其主控因素——以济阳坳陷平南潜山为例 . 沉积学报, 2020, 38(2): 420-428. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.117
    [12] 张藜, 王德英, 张新涛, 刘艺萌, 徐伟.  渤海海域秦皇岛29-2东构造优质混积储层主控因素 . 沉积学报, 2019, 37(1): 200-211. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.086
    [13] 王淑萍, 王铸坤, 操应长, 王艳忠, 杜亮慧, 李宇志.  中深层砂砾岩储层控制因素与分类评价方法——以东营凹陷永1块沙四下亚段为例 . 沉积学报, 2019, 37(5): 1069-1078. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.047
    [14] 郭颖, 王粤川, 韦阿娟, 吴昊明, 叶涛, 高坤顺, 曾金昌.  潜山内幕火山岩储层特征及控制因素——以渤海海域秦皇岛30A地区白垩系为例 . 沉积学报, 2017, 35(2): 343-357. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2017.02.012
    [15] 张金友.  陆相坳陷盆地烃源岩内致密砂岩储层含油性主控因素——以松辽盆地北部中央坳陷区齐家凹陷高台子油层为例 . 沉积学报, 2016, 34(5): 991-1002. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.05.018
    [16] 李超, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 耿名扬, 毕玉泉, 束青林, 徐福刚.  沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下段泥页岩储层特征 . 沉积学报, 2015, 33(4): 795-808. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.04.018
    [17] .  白音查干凹陷桑合地区腾格尔组储层特征及主控因素分析 . 沉积学报, 2013, 31(2): 350-357.
    [18] 刘得文.  柴达木盆地乌南油田N12、N22碎屑岩储层特征及其影响因素分析 . 沉积学报, 2009, 27(4): 657-666.
    [19] 王峰.  鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界盒8储层特征及控制因素分析 . 沉积学报, 2009, 27(2): 238-245.
    [20] 王圣柱.  东营凹陷南斜坡深层成藏特征及主控因素分析 . 沉积学报, 2007, 25(3): 474-481.
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1063
  • HTML全文浏览量:  22
  • PDF下载量:  795
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-11-18
  • 修回日期:  2014-05-12
  • 刊出日期:  2015-02-10

目录

    库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素

    doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
    • 1. 中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室 北京 102249;
    • 2. 中国石油大学盆地与油藏研究中心 北京 102249
      • 基金项目:  国家自然科学基金项目“鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组致密油含油边界识别研究”(批准号:41372143)资助
      作者简介:

      张妮妮 女 1988年出生 硕士研究生 沉积(岩石)学及储层地质学 E-mail: lanhudieznn@163.com

      通讯作者: 刘洛夫 男 教授 E-mail: liulf@cup.edu.cn
    • 收稿日期: 2013-11-18
    • 修回日期: 2014-05-12
    • 刊出日期: 2015-02-10

    • 中图分类号: TE122.2

    摘要: 塔里木盆地致密砂岩气分布广、勘探潜力大,是今后勘探的重要前瞻性领域.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统砂岩储层普遍致密,加强其储层特征及主控因素的研究,对指导下一步的天然气勘探开发具有重要意义.为了揭示了塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层的发育规律及主控因素,通过铸体薄片、阴极发光、扫描电镜、激光共聚焦等测试手段并结合测井资料,研究了储层的岩石学特征、孔隙结构特征和物性特征.结果表明,该区储层岩石类型以岩屑砂岩为主,岩石成分成熟度低,结构成熟度中等;孔隙结构主要为中孔细喉和小孔微喉,孔隙连通性较差;孔隙度大部分为4%~12%,平均为8.12%,有效空气渗透率主要为(0.1~3)×10-3μm2,属于典型的致密砂岩储层.在此基础上,综合分析了致密储层与沉积作用、成岩作用、构造作用的关系.研究认为,储层的物性受沉积作用、成岩作用、构造作用等的共同影响,其中主控因素是受沉积作用控制的粒度、成岩作用中的压实作用和构造压实作用.

    English Abstract

    张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 戴琦雯, 赵园园. 库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
    引用本文: 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 戴琦雯, 赵园园. 库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
    shu
    ZHANG NiNi, LIU LuoFu, SU TianXi, DAI QiWen, ZHAO YuanYuan. Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of the Lower Jurassic Tight Sandstone in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
    Citation: ZHANG NiNi, LIU LuoFu, SU TianXi, DAI QiWen, ZHAO YuanYuan. Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of the Lower Jurassic Tight Sandstone in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 160-169. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.01.017
    shu

      全文HTML

    参考文献 (28)

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回

      友情链接

      期刊在线

      联系我们

      • 网站版权 © 2011《沉积学报》编辑部
      • 地址: 兰州市天水中路8号
      • 邮编: 730000   Tel:（0931）8264231
      • 陇ICP备2021001824号-28
      • 甘公网安备 62010202000673号
      关注微信公众号

      Email alert

      RSS

      系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 设计集成    百度统计

      x 关闭 永久关闭

      2023年地质事件沉积研究新进展国际学术研讨会（第一号通知）