-
由于盆地内充填沉积物的沉积响应记录了与盆地构造活动有关的许多重要信息,很多学者认识到盆中充填沉积物研究的重要性,在充填沉积物沉积学、年代学等方面开展了大量的研究。王成善等[1]认为沉积反应作为造山带构造演化最直接、最具体的地质记录,能够为我们提供最真实、最直观的信息和线索,通过对喜马拉雅造山带沉积反应的研究,分析了喜马拉雅造山带的隆升机制和隆升历史。吴驰华[2]通过对可可西里盆地新生代地层岩石学、沉积学和磷灰石裂变径迹年代学的研究,对青藏高原可可西里盆地和周缘造山带新生代隆升特征进行了探讨。砾岩等粗碎屑岩常形成于构造运动期后或湖盆形成初起,常与侵蚀面相伴生而大面积出现,在构造上常作为地层隆升或快速沉降的证据[3],在地层研究方面常作为地层对比的依据[4]。蔚远江等[5]通过对准噶尔盆地二叠纪各时期扇体时空演化的研究,探讨了准噶尔盆地西北缘前陆冲断带二叠纪同沉积断裂发育和冲断活动特征。周江羽等[3]通过对青藏高原东缘古近纪粗碎屑岩沉积学和年代学研究,指出青藏高原在晚始新世—早渐新世期间曾发生过整体的快速构造隆升。
银根—额济纳旗盆地(以下简称银额盆地)勘探程度很低[6],前人对盆地开展了许多研究工作,但大多都是基于露头资料对晚古生代地层的研究,如卢进才等[7-9]对露头区晚古生代地层格架进行了搭建,认为石炭—二叠系具有良好的油气成藏条件。对于凹陷内部,由于钻井少、且大多集中于盆地东部的查干凹陷,凹陷区的研究程度相对较低,地层格架尚不明确。特别是盆内钻井揭示,“盆山”地层不能建立很好的对比关系,露头区上古生界发育的厚层碳酸盐岩、碎屑岩等在凹陷内并不存在,这就使得中生界底界(即下白垩统底界,少数有侏罗系残余地层的凹陷除外)的划分依据不明确,且不同的学者或研究机构有不同的划分方案[6, 10-11]。对于盆地的构造演化,尤其是中生界凹陷形成的具体时期、地层普遍缺失的三叠纪—侏罗纪的构造演化特征等问题,前人的认识不尽相同。张代生等[12]认为早古生代早期到晚古生代末期,银额盆地一直处于被动陆缘和缝合带上,中生代以来盆地经历了三叠纪—早侏罗世的扭张拉分断陷、晚侏罗世的挤压抬升剥蚀、早白垩世的伸展裂谷和晚白垩世—第三纪沉降拗陷四个演化阶段。刘春燕等[11]认为银额盆地在中生代主要经历了晚三叠世—侏罗纪的断陷盆地初始阶段、早白垩世断陷盆地鼎盛阶段、晚白垩世盆地坳陷阶段3个演化阶段,新生代为挤压抬升的构造背景。
钻井揭示,银额盆地各个凹陷中生界中—底部广泛发育厚层—巨厚层粗碎屑岩,这种普遍发育的盆内特殊充填沉积物对于盆地的原型恢复、构造演化特征研究、地层格架搭建等的研究意义重大。论文对银额盆地路井等6个凹陷、15口探井的粗碎屑岩开展对比研究,分析其沉积特征。结合古生物地层和锆石U-Pb年代学研究,对粗碎屑岩的沉积年代进行厘定。在此基础上,对粗碎屑岩研究的地质意义进行了探讨。
-
粗碎屑岩为厚层状—巨厚层状的砂砾岩、砾岩、砂质砾岩、泥质砂砾岩、凝灰质砾岩等,厚层粗碎屑岩之间通常有砂岩、泥岩、火山岩等夹层。岩石颜色以灰色、深灰色为主,其次是褐色、灰绿色、杂色等(图 2)。粗碎屑岩单层厚度一般为几米到一百多米,最大单层厚度可达295 m(如WC1井)。砂岩/泥岩呈薄层状—中层状,单层厚度为几米到几十米,最厚不超过30 m。
粗碎屑岩在盆地内分布广泛,凹陷内已实施的钻井均有钻遇,但粗碎屑岩累计厚度(包含砂岩、泥岩等夹层)差异较大(图 2、表 1)。盆地东部粗碎屑岩累计厚度一般为200~350 m,如查干坳陷查干凹陷的CC1井为257 m,尚丹坳陷乌力吉凹陷的J1井为347 m。盆地中部粗碎屑岩累计厚度变化最大,如达古坳陷拐子湖凹陷的GC1井最薄,累计厚度仅为35 m;但苏红图坳陷哈日凹陷的HC1井累计厚度可达383 m。盆地西部粗碎屑岩累计厚度变化相对较小,一般为300~450 m,如务桃亥坳陷哨马营凹陷的WC1井为327 m,居延海坳陷路井凹陷的E1井为450 m。
表 1 凹陷不同构造部位粗碎屑岩岩石学特征对比
Table 1. Petrological characteristics of coarse clastic rocks in different tectonic sites of sag
构造位置 岩石类型 碎屑特征 填隙物 胶结类型 结构 代表井 成分 分选性 磨圆度 陡坡带 砂砾岩 石英岩砾、泥岩砾、长石岩砾等 差 次棱角状—次圆状 杂基为主 基底胶结 砾状结构 H4井、H5井等 砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、长石岩砾、石英岩砾、泥岩砾等 差 次棱角状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 HC1井H4井等 含砾砂岩 砂岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 差 次棱角状 胶结物为主 基底胶结 砂状结构 HC1井等 缓坡带 砂砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾、泥岩砾等 差—中等 次棱角状—次圆状 杂基为主 孔隙胶结 砾状结构 H2井、H3井、BC1井等 砾岩 砂岩砾、泥岩砾、变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 差—中等 次圆状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 H2井、BC1井等 砂质砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 中等 次圆状 胶结物为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 BC1井等 粗砂岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 中等 次圆状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砂状结构 H3井、BC1井等 粗碎屑岩在同一凹陷的不同构造部位也广泛发育,如苏红图坳陷的哈日凹陷,凹陷中心(陡坡带)的HC1井厚度为383 m,斜坡带(缓坡带)H3井和H2井的厚度分别为365 m和396 m,凹陷边缘的S1井厚度为672 m(图 3)。
Sedimentary Characteristics and Stratigraphic Age of the Thick-Bedded Coarse Clastic Rocks in the Yingen-Ejin Banner Basin, Northern China
-
摘要: 银根-额济纳旗盆地(简称银额盆地)中生界中下部广泛发育一套厚层粗碎屑岩,结合沉积特征,利用U-Pb定年、孢粉和介形虫资料对其沉积年代进行的厘定结果显示,这些粗碎屑岩可能是凹陷形成初期扇三角洲、水下扇等环境接收的沉积,相对稳定的湖盆沉降和沉积速率形成了银额盆地沉积地层"广泛发育、局部巨厚"的分布特征。锆石U-Pb测年厘定的粗碎屑岩沉积时间为115.6~137.0 Ma,对应年代为早白垩世。粗碎屑岩段的孢粉以Classopollis-Protoconiferus-Perinopollenites组合为特征,介形虫化石主要有单肋女星介、圆星介、狼星介等。这些古生物特征与前人建立的银额盆地及其周缘盆地早白垩世化石特征相似。因此,该粗碎屑岩的地层年代应该为早白垩世,其底界应该是下白垩统底界,可以作为区域性标志层。这样一来,不仅解决了银额盆地中生界下白垩统底界划分依据不明确、划分方案不统一的问题,也能为中生界断陷湖盆形成时期的确定、该区地层普遍缺失的三叠纪-侏罗纪时段的构造演化特征研究等提供依据。Abstract: The thick-bedded coarse clastic rocks at the bottom of the Mesozoic erathem were widely developed in the Yingen-Ejin Banner Basin, northern China, whose age was determined in combination with their sedimentary characteristics in this study. The coarse clastic rocks deposited in a fan sedimentary environment developed at the initial stage of the sags, and the sedimentary facies were fan delta and underwater fan etc.. The coarse clastic rocks were characterized by "extensive development and locally increased thickness" and deposited during the stable and continuous subsidence of the basin with stable depositional rate. The deposition time of the coarse clastic rocks was 115.6-137.0 Ma determined by zircon U-Pb chronology, corresponding to the age of early Cretaceous period. The sporopollen assemblages of these rocks were in a combination of Classopollis-Protoconiferus-Perinopollenites, and the Ostracod fossils were mainly composited of single rib Actress, Metacypris, Lycopterocypris, etc.. The fossil characteristics were similar to that of the Early Cretaceous established by predecessors in the Yingen-Ejin Banner and peripheral basins. Thus, the age of the coarse clastic rocks should be early Cretaceous period, and their bottom boundary could be defined as the regional marker layer of the early Cretaceous strata. These results do not only solve the problems including the lack of evidence on stratigraphic division, shortage of unified stratigraphic classification scheme but also provide information about the Mesozoic sags forming era and potential tectonic evolution of the Triassic to Jurassic period without other stratigraphic records.
-
图 4 粗碎屑岩岩石学特征
a. H 4井,2 938.54 m,砂砾岩岩芯照片,分选差,砾石颗粒呈次棱状,见石英岩砾、泥岩砾等砾石颗粒;b. HC1井,3 333.84 m,中砾岩岩芯照片,分选差,砾石颗粒呈次棱状,见变质岩砾、砂岩砾等砾石颗粒;c. HC1井,3 391.32~3 391.40 m,含砾砂岩岩芯照片,分选差,砾石颗粒呈次棱状,见长石砾、泥砾等砾石颗粒;d. HC1井,3 394.20 m,中砾岩,镜下为一颗砾石,成分为中性喷出岩,玻基交织结构,由微晶状斜长石、钠长石、玻璃质组成,玻璃质具脱玻化呈雏晶状。气孔发育,形态不规则,被白云石等充填(岩石薄片,正交光);e. HC1井,3 073.68~3 073.81 m,含砾砂岩,见砂岩砾(岩石薄片,正交光);f. HC1井,3 073.68~3 073.81 m,含砾砂岩,见石英岩砾(岩石薄片,正交光);g. H2井,1 465.75~1 465.91 m,砂砾岩岩芯照片,分选中等,砾石颗粒呈次圆状,砾石主要为石英岩砾、泥岩砾为主,砾径最大约62 mm,最小约为0.5 mm,一般2~6 mm;h. BC1井,2 422.75~2 422.94 m,粗砾岩岩芯照片,分选中等,砾石颗粒呈圆状—次圆状;i. BC1井,2 552.33~2 552.46 m,砂质砾岩岩芯照片,分选中等,砾石颗粒呈次圆状;j. H2井,1 465.75~1 465.91 m,砂砾岩,见石英岩砾(岩石薄片,正交光);k. BC1井,2 545.22~2 545.35 m,细砾岩,分选差,砾间填充细碎屑颗粒(岩石薄片,正交光);l. BC1井,2 552.33~2 552.46 m,砂质砾岩,见砂岩砾石和泥岩砾石(岩石薄片,正交光)
Figure 4. Lithological characteristics of the coarse clastic rocks
图 10 HC1井孢粉化石图版
1.Perotrilites-周壁孢,3 359 m;2. Perinopollenites-周壁粉,3 175 m;3. Densoisporites-层环孢,3 359 m;4. Paleoconiferus-古松柏粉,3 175 m;5. Abietineaepollenites-单束松粉,3 175 m;6. Perinopollenites-周壁粉,3 359 m;7. Classopollis-克拉梭粉,3 175 m;8. Pinuspollenites-双束松粉,3 175 m;9. Abiespollenites-冷杉粉,3 175 m;10. Cycadopites-苏铁粉,3 175 m;11. Klausipollenites-克氏粉,3 359 m;12. Cycadopites-苏铁粉,3 359 m;13. Classopollis-克拉梭粉,3 359 m;14. Cordaitina-科达粉,3 359 m;15. Gardenasporites-假二肋粉,3 359 m;16. Taxodiaceaepollenites-杉科粉,3 175 m;17. Protopinus-原始松粉,3 175 m;18. Piceites-拟云杉粉,3 359 m;19. Protoconiferus-原始松柏粉,3 175 m
Figure 10. Pollen fossil plate of Well HC1
表 1 凹陷不同构造部位粗碎屑岩岩石学特征对比
Table 1. Petrological characteristics of coarse clastic rocks in different tectonic sites of sag
构造位置 岩石类型 碎屑特征 填隙物 胶结类型 结构 代表井 成分 分选性 磨圆度 陡坡带 砂砾岩 石英岩砾、泥岩砾、长石岩砾等 差 次棱角状—次圆状 杂基为主 基底胶结 砾状结构 H4井、H5井等 砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、长石岩砾、石英岩砾、泥岩砾等 差 次棱角状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 HC1井H4井等 含砾砂岩 砂岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 差 次棱角状 胶结物为主 基底胶结 砂状结构 HC1井等 缓坡带 砂砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾、泥岩砾等 差—中等 次棱角状—次圆状 杂基为主 孔隙胶结 砾状结构 H2井、H3井、BC1井等 砾岩 砂岩砾、泥岩砾、变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 差—中等 次圆状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 H2井、BC1井等 砂质砾岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 中等 次圆状 胶结物为主 接触胶结 砾状结构 BC1井等 粗砂岩 变质岩砾、火山岩砾、石英岩砾等 中等 次圆状 杂基为主 接触胶结 砂状结构 H3井、BC1井等 -
[1] 王成善, 丁学林.喜马拉雅的隆升及其沉积反应研究新进展[J].地质科技情报, 1998, 17(1):1-7. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93477A/199801/3012822.html Wang Chengshan, Ding Xuelin. New progress of the study on Himalaya uplift and its sedimentary response[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1998, 17(1):1-7. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93477A/199801/3012822.html [2] 吴驰华. 青藏高原北部可可西里地区新生代构造隆升的沉积记录[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014. Wu Chihua. The Cenozoic tectonic uplift sedimentary record of orogenic belt in Hoh Xil area, the north part of the Tibetan Plateau[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014. [3] 周江羽, 王江海, Yin A, 等.青藏高原东缘古近纪粗碎屑岩沉积学及其构造意义[J].地质学报, 2003, 77(2):262-271, 296. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4876596 Zhou Jiangyu, Wang Jianghai, Yin A, et al. Sedimentology and tectonic significance of Paleogene coarse clastic rocks in eastern Tibet[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2003, 77(2):262-271, 296. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4876596 [4] 樊拥军, 王福生.沉积岩和沉积相[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:45-48. Fan Yongjun, Wang Fusheng. Sedimentary rocks and sedimentary facies[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:45-48. [5] 蔚远江, 何登发, 雷振宇, 等.准噶尔盆地西北缘前陆冲断带二叠纪逆冲断裂活动的沉积响应[J].地质学报, 2004, 78(5):612-625. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200405005 Yu Yuanjiang, He Dengfa, Lei Zhenyu, et al. Sedimentary response to the activity of the Permian thrusting fault in the foreland thrust belt of the northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2004, 78(5):612-625. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200405005 [6] 张代生, 李光云, 罗肇, 等.银根-额济纳旗盆地油气地质条件[J].新疆石油地质, 2003, 24(2):130-133. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/THYQ200201002.htm Zhang Daisheng, Li Guangyun, Luo Zhao, et al. Characteristics of petroleum geology in Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2003, 24(2):130-133. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/THYQ200201002.htm [7] 卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系-二叠系沉积建造与生烃条件:石炭系-二叠系油气地质条件研究之一[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6):811-826. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/107956f1770bf78a65295462.html Lu Jincai, Chen Gaochao, Wei Xianyang, et al. Carboniferous-Permian sedimentary formation and hydrocarbon generation conditions in Ejin Banner and its vicinities, western Inner Mongolia:A study of Carboniferous-Permian petroleum geological conditions (part 1)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(6):811-826. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/107956f1770bf78a65295462.html [8] 卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系-二叠系的储集条件-石炭系-二叠系油气地质条件研究之二[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6):827-837. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201106003 Lu Jincai, Chen Gaochao, Wei Xianyang, et al. Reservoir conditions of Carboniferous-Permian strata in Ejin Banner and its vicinities, western Inner Mongolia:A study of Carboniferous-Permian petroleum geological conditions (part 2)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(6):827-837. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201106003 [9] 卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系-二叠系沉积后的构造演化、盖层条件与油气信息:石炭系-二叠系油气地质条件研究之三[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6):838-849. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201106004 Lu Jincai, Chen Gaochao, Wei Xianyang, et al. Post-sedimentary tectonic evolution, cap rock condition and hydrocarbon information of Carboniferous-Permian in Ejin Banner and its vicinities, western Inner Mongolia:A study of Carboniferous-Permian petroleum geological conditions (part 3)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(6):838-849. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgqydz201106004 [10] 黄航. 银额盆地上古生界构造格架及区域演化特征分析: 以居延海坳陷为例[D]. 武汉: 长江大学, 2013. Huang Hang. Tectonic framework and regional evolution characteristics of the upper Palaeozoic in Yin-E Basin: A case study in Ju Yanhai depression[D]. Wuhan: Yangtze University, 2013. [11] 刘春燕, 林畅松, 吴茂炳, 等.银根-额济纳旗中生代盆地构造演化及油气勘探前景[J].中国地质, 2006, 33(6):1328-1335. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_zgdizhi200606016 Liu Chunyan, Lin Changsong, Wu Maobing, et al. Tectonic evolution and petroleum prospects of the Mesozoic Inggen-Ejin Qi Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(6):1328-1335. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_zgdizhi200606016 [12] 张代生.银根-额济纳旗盆地油气地质条件与勘探方向[J].吐哈油气, 2002, 7(1):5-10. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/THYQ200201002.htm Zhang Daisheng. The oil and gas geologic conditions and exploration potential of Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin[J]. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2002, 7(1):5-10. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/THYQ200201002.htm [13] 钟福平, 钟建华, 王毅, 等.银根-额济纳旗盆地苏红图坳陷早白垩世火山岩地球化学特征与成因[J].矿物学报, 2014, 34(1):107-116. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/KWXB201401017.htm Zhong Fuping, Zhong Jianhua, Wang Yi, et al. Geochemistry characteristics and origin of early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Suhongtu depression, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Acta Mieralogica Sinica, 2014, 34(1):107-116. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/KWXB201401017.htm [14] 郝银全, 林卫东, 董伟宏, 等.银额盆地与二连盆地成藏条件对比及有利勘探区带[J].新疆石油地质, 2006, 27(6):664-666. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.06.004 Hao Yinquan, Lin Weidong, Dong Weihong, et al. Correlation of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions in Yin'e Basin and Erlian Basin and selection of favorable prospecting zones[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006, 27(6):664-666. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.06.004 [15] 荆国强. 银根-额济纳旗地区晚古生代盆地形成与演化研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010. Jing Guoqiang. Study on the formation and evolution of the basin in Neopaleozoic in area of Yin'gen-Eji'naqi[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2010. [16] Horton B K, Yin A, Spurlin M S, et al. Paleocene-Eocene syncontractional sedimentation in narrow, lacustrine-dominated basins of east-central Tibet[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2002, 114(7):771-786. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114<0771:PESSIN>2.0.CO;2 [17] 范迎风. 查干凹陷沉积与储层特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2006. Fan Yingfeng. The study of sedimentology and reservoir characteristics in Chagan depression[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2006. [18] 刘招君.湖泊水下扇沉积特征及影响因素:以伊通盆地莫里青断陷双阳组为例[J].沉积学报, 2003, 21(1):148-154. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2477.shtml Liu Zhaojun. Subaqueous fan sedimentary characteristics and influence factors:A case study of Shuangyang Formation in Moliqing fault subsidence of Yitong Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(1):148-154. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2477.shtml [19] 刘家铎, 田景春, 何建军, 等.近岸水下扇沉积微相及储层的控制因素研究:以沾化凹陷罗家鼻状构造沙四段为例[J].成都理工学院学报, 1999, 26(4):365-369. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb199904008 Liu Jiaduo, Tian Jingchun, He Jianjun, et al. A Study of sedimentary microfacies and controlling factors of the reservoirs of the nearshore subaqueous fan:Taking the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Luojia Nose, Zhanhua depression for an example[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 1999, 26(4):365-369. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb199904008 [20] 吴元保, 郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(16):1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002 Wu Yuanbao, Zheng Yongfei. Research on genetic mineralogy of zircon and its restriction to the interpretation of U-Pb age[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(16):1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002 [21] 王磊, 杨建国, 王小红, 等.甘肃北山大山头南基性-超基性杂岩体SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2015, 34(5):697-709. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/48edbe94804d2b160a4ec095.html Wang Lei, Yang Jianguo, Wang Xiaohong, et al. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of Dashantounan basic-ultrabasic intrusion complex in the Beishan Mountain, Gansu province[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2015, 34(5):697-709. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/48edbe94804d2b160a4ec095.html [22] 冯乔, 秦宇, 付锁堂, 等.柴达木盆地北缘乌兰县牦牛山组碎屑锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].沉积学报, 2015, 33(3):486-499. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3533.shtml Feng Qiao, Qin Yu, Fu Suotang, et al. U-P age of detrital zircons and its geological significance from Maoniushan Formation in the Wulan county, northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(3):486-499. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3533.shtml [23] Dhuime B, Delphine B, Bruguier O, et al. Age, provenance and post-deposition metamorphic overprint of detrital zircons from the Nathorst Land group (NE Greenland):A LA-ICP-MS and SIMS study[J]. Precambrian Research, 2007, 155(1/2):24-46. [24] Zhou Z H, Li B Y, Wang A S, et al. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb Dating and Geochemical Characteristics of Late Variscan Granites of the Daitongshan Copper Deposit and Lamahanshan Polymetallic-Silver Deposit, Southern Daxing'anling, China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(5):772-795. doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0374-6 [25] 王廷印, 高军平, 王金荣, 等.内蒙古阿拉善北部地区碰撞期和后造山期岩浆作用[J].地质学报, 1998, 72(2):126-137. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE199802003.htm Wang Tingyin, Gao Junping, Wang Jinrong, et al. Magmatism of collisional and post-orogenic period in northern Alaxa region in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1998, 72(2):126-137. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE199802003.htm [26] 王香增, 陈治军, 任来义, 等.银根-额济纳旗盆地苏红图坳陷H井锆石LA-ICP-MSU-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].沉积学报, 2016, 34(5):853-867. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3693.shtml Wang Xiangzeng, Chen Zhijun, Ren Laiyi, et al. U-Pb age of zircon and its geological significance in Suhongtu depression, Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(5):853-867. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract3693.shtml [27] 卫平生, 张虎权, 陈启林.银根-额济纳旗盆地油气地质特征及勘探前景[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2006:37-42. Wei Pingsheng, Zhang Huquan, Chen Qilin. Oil and gas geological characteristics and exploration prospect of Yingen-Ejinaqi Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2006:37-42. [28] 卫平生, 姚清洲, 吴时国.银根-额济纳旗盆地白垩纪地层、古生物群和古环境研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(2):17-21. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_xasyxyxb200502004 Wei Pingsheng, Yao Qingzhou, Wu Shiguo. Study on Cretaceous stratum, palaeobiota and palaeoclimate of Yin'gen-Ejinaqi Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 20(2):17-21. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_xasyxyxb200502004 [29] 旷红伟, 柳永清, 刘燕学, 等.兴蒙造山区及邻区早白垩世盆地岩石地层格架与沉积古地理演化[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(7):1063-1084. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_zgqydz201307011 Kuang Hongwei, Liu Yongqing, Liu Yanxue, et al. Stratigraphy and depositional palaeogeography of the early Cretaceous basins in Da Hinggan Mountains-Mongolia orogenic belt and its neighboring areas[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(7):1063-1084. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_zgqydz201307011 [30] 王思恩, 庞其清, 王大宁.新疆准噶尔盆地侏罗系-白垩系生物地层和同位素年龄研究的新进展[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(4):493-502. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201204000.htm Wang Sien, Pang Qiqing, Wang Daning. New advances in the study of Jurassic-Cretaceous biostratigraphy and isotopic ages of the Junggar Basin in Xinjiang and their significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(4):493-502. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201204000.htm [31] 李友桂, 赵治信.新疆吐谷鲁群早白垩世介形虫动物群[J].地质学报, 1984, 58(3):185-195, 273-274. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4877047 Li Yougui, Zhao Zhixin. Early Cretaceous ostracods from the Tugulu Group in Xinjiang Autonomous Region[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1984, 58(3):185-195, 273-274. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4877047 [32] 胡艳霞, 徐东来.甘肃玉门下沟地区早白垩世下沟组介形类[J].微体古生物学报, 2005, 22(2):173-184. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=wtgswxb200502007 Hu Yanxia, Xu Donglai. Early Cretaceous ostracods from the Xiagou Formation in Xiagou, Gansu province[J]. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 2005, 22(2):173-184. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=wtgswxb200502007 [33] 魏魁生, 徐怀大.二连盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序地层特征[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 1994, 19(2):181-193. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/94035X/19941902/1308916.html Wei Kuisheng, Xu Huaida. Sequence stratigraphic features of Cretaceous nonmarine sediments in Erlian Basin[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1994, 19(2):181-193. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/94035X/19941902/1308916.html