Comparison of Experimental Results between Two Simulation Methods
-
摘要: 进行单温阶加温和连续加温两种方式的模拟实验,前者相当于封闭体系,后者相当于开放体系。对比两者的油气产率,并探讨两者与自然界烃源岩生排烃过程之间的关系。实验结果表明,总气体产率和烃气产率开放体系均低于封闭体系;排出油量和总生油率开放体系均大于封闭体系。自然界烃源岩的生排烃过程可能是介于封闭体系和开放体系之间的一种状况。Abstract: The authors carry out simulation experiment with separate heating and continuous heating, the former is equivalent to sealed system, and the other is equivalent to opened system. Comparing the oil and gas yielding in different systems, we discussed t the relationship of natural hydrocarbon generation process and both of the heating mode. The experiment indicates that total gas yielding and gaseous hydrocarbon yielding in opened system is lower than that in sealed system: and oil quantity and total oil production yielding in opened system is higher than that in sealed system. The natural hydrocarbon process is the status between the opened system and sealed system.
-
Key words:
- shales /
- coal /
- bitumen /
- gas-generation simulated experiment /
-
[1] 刘宝泉.上元古界下马岭组页岩干酪根的油气生成模拟实验.石油实验地质,1990,12(2):147～160 [2] 曹慧缇.碳酸盐岩生烃机制的新认识.石油实验地质,1991,13(3):222～236 [3] 王兆云.加水热模拟实验气态产物特征及演化规律研究.石油勘探与开发,1995, 22(3): [4] 刘宝泉.海相烃源岩模拟实验、演化特征、生排烃模式及生烃机理探讨.见:赵政璋主编.青藏高原海相烃源岩的油气生成.北京:科学出版社,2000.101～107 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 452
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 413
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
