[1] |
狄明信,戴启德,国景星. 济阳坳陷上第三系的沉积特征及沉积相的纵向演化规律[J]. 地质论评,1994,40(增刊1):46-51.
Di Mingxin, Dai Qide, Guo Jingxing. The sedimentary characteristics and vertical change of sedimentary facies of the Neogene in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Geological Review, 1994, 40(Suppl. 1): 46-51. |
[2] |
李双应,李忠,王忠诚,等. 胜利油区孤岛油田馆上段沉积模式研究[J]. 沉积学报,2001,19(3):386-393.
Li Shuangying, Li Zhong, Wang Zhongcheng, et al. The study of depositional model in the upper member of Guantao Formation in Gudao oilfield of the Shengli petroleum province[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2001, 19(3): 386-393. |
[3] |
李琦,田景春,何建军,等. 河流相砂体的沉积微相特征:以济阳坳陷埕东北坡馆陶组砂体为例[J]. 岩相古地理,1999,19(1):25-31.
Li Qi, Tian Jingchun, He Jianjun, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the fluvial sandstones: An example from the sandstones in the Guantao Formation on the northern slope of the Chengdong oilfield in the Jiyang Depression, eastern China[J]. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 1999, 19(1): 25-31. |
[4] |
蔡忠. 孤岛、孤东油田馆上段微相特征与剩余油分布[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):256-258.
Cai Zhong. Characteristics of microfacies and distribution of remaining oil in upper member of Guantao Formation from Gudao and Gudong oilfields[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2000, 21(3): 256-258. |
[5] |
袁静,鹿洪友,高喜龙,等. 胜利油区新北油田馆上段沉积特征及沉积相模式[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):18-25.
Yuan Jing, Lu Hongyou, Gao Xilong, et al. The sedimentary characteristics and facies model of the upper member of Guantao Formation of the Eocene in Xinbei oilfield of Shengli petroleum province[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(1): 18-25. |
[6] |
钱宁. 关于河流分类及成因问题的讨论[J]. 地理学报,1985,40(1):1-10.
Qian Ning. On the classification and causes of formation of different channel patterns[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1985, 40(1): 1-10. |
[7] |
黄锡荃,柳中坚. 长江下游分汊河型内部结构和空间效应的研究[J]. 地理学报,1991,46(2):169-177.
Huang Xiquan, Liu Zhongjian. A study on the inner structure and spatial effect of the braided pattern in the lower reaches of the Chang Jiang (Yangzi River)[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1991, 46(2): 169-177. |
[8] |
王随继,任明达. 根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J]. 沉积学报,1999,17(2):240-246.
Wang Suiji, Ren Mingda. A new classification of fluvial rivers according to channel planform and sediment characteristics[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(2): 240-246. |
[9] |
王随继,尹寿鹏. 网状河流和分汊河流的河型归属讨论[J]. 地学前缘,2000,7(增刊1):79-86.
Wang Suiji, Yin Shoupeng. Discussion on channel patterns of anastomosing and anabranched rivers[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(Suppl. 1): 79-86. |
[10] |
Brice J C. Planform properties of meandering river[C]//River meandering, proceedings of the October, Rivers ‘83 Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASCE, 1983: 1-15. |
[11] |
Tooth S, Nanson G C. Anabranching rivers on the northern Plains of arid central Australia[J]. Geomorphology, 1999, 29(3/4): 211-233. |
[12] |
Jain V, Sinha R. Fluvial dynamics of an anabranching river system in Himalayan Foreland Basin, Baghmati River, North Bihar plains, India[J]. Geomorphology, 2004, 60(1/2): 147-170. |
[13] |
Nanson G C. Anabranching and anastomosing rivers[J]. Treatise on Geomorphology, 2013, 9: 330-345. |
[14] |
谭程鹏,于兴河,李胜利,等. 辫状河—曲流河转换模式探讨:以准噶尔盆地南缘头屯河组露头为例[J]. 沉积学报,2014,32(3):450-458.
Tan Chengpeng, Yu Xinghe, Li Shengli, et al. Discussion on the model of braided river transform to meandering river: As an example of Toutunhe Formation in southern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3): 450-458. |
[15] |
李胜利,于兴河,姜涛,等. 河流辫—曲转换特点与废弃河道模式[J]. 沉积学报,2017,35(1):1-9.
Li Shengli, Yu Xinghe, Jiang Tao, et al. Meander-braided transition features and abandoned channel patterns in fluvial environment[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(1): 1-9. |
[16] |
晋剑利,黄奇志,赵国良,等. 南苏丹Melut盆地Palogue油田古近系Yabus组河型演化规律及主控因素分析[J]. 古地理学报,2018,20(6):951-962.
Jin Jianli, Huang Qizhi, Zhao Guoliang, et al. Evolution of fluvial pattern and analysis of dominated factors in the Paleogene Yabus Formation of Palogue oilfield in Melut Basin, South Sudan[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 20(6): 951-962. |
[17] |
Sokołowski R J, Janowski Ł, Hrynowiecka A, et al. Evolution of fluvial system during the Pleistocene warm stage (Marine Isotope Stage 7)–A case study from the Błądzikowo Formation, N Poland[J]. Quaternary International, 2019, 501: 109-119. |
[18] |
Štor T, Schaller M, Merchel S, et al. Quaternary evolution of the Ploučnice River system (Bohemian Massif) based on fluvial deposits dated with optically stimulated luminescence and in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides[J]. Geomorphology, 2019, 329: 152-169. |
[19] |
王随继. 黄河流域河型转化现象初探[J]. 地理科学进展,2008,27(2):10-17.
Wang Suiji. Analysis of river pattern transformations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(2): 10-17. |
[20] |
吴智平,史卜庆,周瑶琪,等. 济阳坳陷新老第三纪地层间断面研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):313-317.
Wu Zhiping, Shi Buqing, Zhou Yaoqi, et al. A study on hiatus surface of Neogene-Eogene in Jiyang Depression[J]. Oli & Gas Geology, 1998, 19(4): 313-317. |
[21] |
马立驰,王永诗,杨贵丽. 垦东—埕岛构造带古近纪断层活动特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):42-46,51.
Ma Lichi, Wang Yongshi, Yang Guili. Features of Paleogene fault activity in the Kendong-Chengdao structural belt[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(3): 42-46, 51. |
[22] |
张克鑫,漆家福,林会喜. 济阳地区埕岛—垦东构造带中生代的逆冲断层及其与郯庐断裂带的关系[J]. 地质科学,2006,41(2):270-277, 290.
Zhang Kexin, Qi Jiafu, Lin Huixi. Mesozoic thrusting of the Chengdao-Kendong structural belt and its relation to the Tan-Lu fault zone in Jiyang area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2006, 41(2): 270-277, 290. |
[23] |
戴启德,狄明信,国景星,等. 济阳坳陷上第三系沉积相研究[J]. 地质论评,1994,40(增刊1):8-18.
Dai Qide, Di Mingxin, Guo Jingxing, et al. Sedimentary facies research of the Neogene in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Geological Review, 1994, 40(Suppl. 1): 8-18. |
[24] |
国景星,戴启德,狄明信,等. 济阳坳陷上第三系馆陶组上段沉积相研究[J]. 地质论评,1994,40(增刊1):145-153.
Guo Jingxing, Dai Qide, Di Mingxin, et al. Sedimentary facies of the upper member of the Neogene Guantao Formation in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Geological Review, 1994, 40(Suppl. 1): 145-153. |
[25] |
王中文,苑雪阁,白光勇. 济阳坳陷馆陶期水系及沉积环境分析[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),1993,17(3):12-18.
Wang Zhongwen, Yuan Xuege, Bai Guangyong. Palaeodrainage systems and sedimentary environment analysis of Guantao Formation in Jiyang Depression[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 1993, 17(3): 12-18. |
[26] |
袁静,杜玉民,李云南. 惠民凹陷古近系碎屑岩主要沉积环境粒度概率累积曲线特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):103-106.
Yuan Jing, Du Yumin, Li Yunnan. Probability cumulative grain size curves in terrigenous depositional environments of the Paleogene in Huimin Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3): 103-106. |
[27] |
袁静. 沉积学基础及应用[M]. 东营:中国石油大学出版社,2013:40-42.
Yuan Jing. Fundamentals and application of sedimentology[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2013: 40-42. |
[28] |
袁静,杨学君,路智勇,等. 东营凹陷盐22块沙四上亚段砂砾岩粒度概率累积曲线特征[J]. 沉积学报,2011,29(5):815-824.
Yuan Jing, Yang Xuejun, Lu Zhiyong, et al. Probability cumulative grain size curves in sandy conglomerate of the upper Es4 in Yan 22 block, Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(5): 815-824. |
[29] |
文华国,郑荣才,高红灿,等. 苏里格气田苏6井区下石盒子组盒8段沉积相特征[J]. 沉积学报,2007,25(1):90-98.
Wen Huaguo, Zheng Rongcai, Gao Hongcan, et al. Sedimentary facies of the 8th member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Su6 area, Sulige gas field[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(1): 90-98. |
[30] |
闫伟鹏. 济阳坳陷滩海地区新近系冲积—河流相层序地层研究与有利成藏区带预测[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2005.
Yan Weipeng. Study on alluvial-fluvial facies sequence stratigraphy and favorable reseivoir zones prediction for Neogene, Inshore area, Jiyang Depression[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2005. |
[31] |
Miall A D. Fluvial depositional systems[M]. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2014. |
[32] |
唐武,王英民,赵志刚,等. 河型转化研究进展综述[J]. 地质论评,2016,62(1):138-152.
Tang Wu, Wang Yingmin, Zhao Zhigang, et al. A review of fluvial pattern transformation[J]. Geological Review, 2016, 62(1): 138-152. |
[33] |
张昌民,朱锐,赵康,等. 从端点走向连续:河流沉积模式研究进展述评[J]. 沉积学报,2017,35(5):926-944.
Zhang Changmin, Zhu Rui, Zhao Kang, et al. From end member to continuum: Review of fluvial facies model research[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 926-944. |
[34] |
陈彬滔,于兴河,王磊,等. 河流相沉积的河型转换特征与控制因素及其油气地质意义:以南苏丹Melut盆地Ruman地区坳陷期Jimidi组为例[J]. 沉积学报,2021,39(2):424-433.
Chen Bintao, Yu Xinghe, Wang Lei, et al. Features and controlling factors of river pattern transition in fluvial deposition and its significance for petroleum geology: An insight from the Jimidi Formation in the Ruman area, Melut Basin, South Sudan[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2021,39(2):424-433. |
[35] |
Nakayama K, Ulak P D. Evolution of fluvial style in the Siwalik Group in the foothills of the Nepal Himalaya[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1999, 125(3/4): 205-224. |
[36] |
Bordy E M, Hancox P J, Rubidge B S. Fluvial style variations in the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic Elliot formation, main Karoo Basin, South Africa[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2004, 38(4): 383-400. |
[37] |
Mikhailov V M. Flood-plain taliks in the valleys of meandering rivers in northeastern Russia[J]. Earth’s Cryosphere, 2016, XX(2): 37-44. |
[38] |
Umazano A M, Krause J M, Bellosi E S, et al. Changing fluvial styles in volcaniclastic successions: A cretaceous example from the Cerro Barcino Formation, Patagonia[J]. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2017, 77: 185-205. |
[39] |
方旭庆. 胜利油区新近系整装油田翼部的油气分布规律:以孤东油田为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2006,13(4):45-47.
Fang Xuqing. Distribution characteristics of oil and gas at the wings of Neogene integral oilfields in Shengli petroliferous province-taking Gudong oilfield as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(4): 45-47. |
[40] |
董波. 构造作用与济阳坳陷上第三系油气成藏[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2004,11(3):25-27,30.
Dong Bo. Tectonic action and oil-gas reservoir forming in Neogene of Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004, 11(3): 25-27, 30. |
[41] |
孙喜新. 济阳坳陷馆陶组构造特征及成藏模式研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所),2005.
Sun Xixin. Study on the structural characteristics and reservoir forming model of Neogene Guantao Formation in Jiyang Depression[D]. Guangzhou: Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Science (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2005. |
[42] |
马晖. 济阳坳陷下第三系构造特征及其对层序的控制作用[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所),2005.
Ma Hui. The characters and control of tectonics on sequence stratigraphy of the Lower Tertiary in Jiyang Basin[D]. Guangzhou: Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Science (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2005. |
[43] |
Ikeda S, Izumi N. Width and depth of self-formed straight gravel rivers with bank vegetation[J]. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(10): 2353-2364. |
[44] |
Millar R G. Influence of bank vegetation on alluvial channel patterns[J]. Water Resources Research, 2000, 36(4): 1109-1118. |
[45] |
Gurnell A M, Bertoldi W, Corenblit D. Changing river channels: The roles of hydrological processes, plants and pioneer fluvial landforms in humid temperate, mixed load, gravel bed rivers[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2012, 111(1/2): 129-141. |
[46] |
Bätz N, Colombini P, Cherubini P, et al. Groundwater controls on river channel pattern[C]//Proceedings of the 19th EGU general assembly. Vienna: EGU, 2017. |
[47] |
Leigh D S. Terminal Pleistocene braided to meandering transition in rivers of the Southeastern USA[J]. CATENA, 2006, 66(1/2): 155-160. |
[48] |
王冠民,林国松. 济阳坳陷古近纪的古气候区分析[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报,2012,31(5):505-509.
Wang Guanmin, Lin Guosong. Eogene paleoclimate zone study in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(5): 505-509. |
[49] |
纪友亮,周勇,吴胜和,等. 河流相地层高精度地层构型界面形成机制及识别方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(2):8-15.
Ji Youliang, Zhou Yong, Wu Shenghe, et al. Formation mechanism and recognizing method of high resolution strata architecture boundary in fluvial strata[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(2): 8-15. |
[50] |
苗小龙,王红亮,于波,等. 高分辨层序地层学中A/S值量化方法的研究与讨论[J]. 沉积学报,2013,31(6):1088-1093.
Miao Xiaolong, Wang Hongliang, Yu Bo, et al. Research and discussion: An approach to quantitative A/S in high-resolution sequence stratigraphy[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(6): 1088-1093. |
[51] |
邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟. 高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):90-95,114.
Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang, Li Xiaomeng. Application of high-resolution sequence stratigraphic correlation to fluvial facies[J]. Oli & Gas Geology, 1997, 18(2): 90-95, 114. |